[hijack] Nothing personal towards you, but why is it that practically everytime any sportswriter is mentioned on this board, there's invariably someone who comes in and says that said writer sucks/is garbage/knows nothing/is an idiot? Seriously, I don't think I've seen any sportswriter not catch flak here (save Bruce Miles, who I assume gets a pass from some people because he posts occasionally). I don't read the sportswriters regularly, but damn ... they can't all be anti-Cubs biased, rumor-mongering, sensationalist baseball morons, can they? [/hijack] My 2 cents: It's because their bosses have demanded that they become sensationalist morons who spew completely irrational ideas that have no base in reality or coherent thought. It's unfortunate that they have to pander to the lowest common denominator to sell papers instead of actually being good journalists and writing things that make sense. Yep, everyone calls individual sportswriters sensationalist hacks because they're sensationalist hacks. These guys for the most part suck. Bruce gets some leeway for coming here, but people were fans of his long before he posted here.(And his chats don't make a It makes sense to give Bruce some leeway too because we have a bit of a view into him and can see his beliefs on baseball. Meanwhile, hobbits like Paul Sullivan have their chance to connect directly to his readers and instead he treats them like they're not worthy of his time in his dumbass mailbag. Nowhere else in your life will you find a field where people think they know so much, when in fact they know so little.