This is reasonable/fair. I think fans are ready to credit Theo for this team because they believe the plan he has been executing is starting to produce results. It's hard not to speculate that things are on the upswing and the team is destined for repeated playoff appearances. Obviously how the future plays out answers the question. Out of curiosity, rather than just say "let's see what the results are to judge Theo," how many playoff appearances do you expect for the Cubs from 2016-2020? I know you could say, I'm not going to guess at numbers, but based on what you'e seen and your overall impression what is your answer? To answer your question, I think 3 out of 5 is a good over/under. I think the upswing thing is the appeal of narrative. We love to explain our sports teams in terms of stories, and the "We were bad, then we were patient, then we got better, then we got great" is an easy story to understand. Getting better, or more importantly getting great, for 2016 and 2017 looks pretty tough to me. Not impossible. It's pretty easy to see how it could happen. All you need is a couple of breakout offensive seasons from our ubertalents and the top half of the pitching staff to stay healthy. But I think the downside is real too: On offense, the only guy who is young enough to make me really sure he'll be noticeably better in 2016 is Russell. The rest are in that iffy range of just barely pre-prime where the median of the curve is not much improvement left at all. For the pitching, I think the question is just how often are you going to get 150+ healthy, productive innings from your top 4? It's not something that's going to happen every year. And we're going to need it to, because there is just stone cold nothing coming up the pipe. The first wave of pitching prospects was supposed to be ready by now, and it's looking like a pretty substantial bust. In the meantime, the Cubs have been one of the most overachieving teams in the league by Pythagorean Wins, and there's two *really* good teams in the division that have pretty good cases to still be pretty good next year. The narrative says the Cubs are betting on the future in 2016. We've seen what betting on the future looks like this year: it's a messy, unpredictable affair. Sometimes it shows up as Kris Bryant playing at a 5-fWAR pace, and sometimes it's thinking you've got the middle infield settled with double redundancy only to have three of your four highly talented young guys become sub-replacement simultaneously. I think three is a very fair response. I'm somewhat of an optimist, so I'll be truly disappointed if we don't take the over on that. It's easy to ignore the downside risk. I agree that Russell is by far the most encouraging player this year as far as future breakouts go. Soler hasn't shown the discipline he was reported to have had. Castro is not the perennial all star he once was and may be jettisoned. Bryant, Schwarber, Rizzo at least appear to have rock solid futures (positional concerns notwithstanding). Baez is not the high risk high reward example that everyone thinks he is, there is much more downside risk with his contact issues. But the big four/five/six are a pretty terrific core to build around. As far as the pitching staff goes, I'm less concerned than you are. Yes, there will be injuries and unexpected failures in the pitching staff, but many teams don't have a good option at four or five. I think free agency has always been the plan for short term starting pitching, despite the draft strategy. Lester, Arrieta, Hammel, Hendricks are pretty solid for 1-4 for the next few years. Even with injuries, the FO has shown pretty good ability to identify plug & play starting pitching, and I think they'll make a significant addition this offseason to bolster the depth so that only a #5 is needed to be added down the line. Bullpens are such a crapshoot that I am comfortable sticking with Strop, Grimm, Ramirez, Rondon and adding to them with a solid FA piece and then whatever may come from Black, Edwards, Rivero, Rosscup, Johnson, Paniagua, etc to fill out the group, along with whatever retreads they pick up year to year. It may seem like success seems to come to easily, but I'm just not going to sweat the 6th and 7th guys in the bullpen, fifth starter, twelfth and thirteenth bench options. The bulk of a successful team is there and anyone could fill in around that.