This may be the craziest thing you've ever posted here, and that's saying something. Lovie's teams won because of the defense. Lovie's focus was on the defense. The defense, however, would not have been immune to the wall of age it ran into if Lovie stuck around. If anything, Lovie got out at the right time because last year probably would have been even worse under him. They had successfully cycled through top defensive players while not bottoming out in the past. Tommie Harris, agunleye, alex brown, vasher, mike brown etc. lovie was good at getting guys into his system. I have no doubt the defense would have continued to be better than average. There was no cycling happening at the end of his run; their draft picks were failing left and right, so do you honestly think that in a single offseason the presence of Lovie Smith as HC alone would have been enough to suddenly reverse that course and prevent the old defense from collapsing into the cellar? Lovie Smith doesn't reverse the aging process on Briggs and Peppers. Lovie Smith doesn't prevent Tillman from being injured. Hell, the only thing he possibly changes is them stupidly retaining Urlacher and he was nothing at that point. Yes I do believe they would have gotten more out of the talent they had last year and this year. Definitely. Trestman and his staff are tht bad that hey could take a team I believe would have competed for a title under lovie and turned it into a joke. This assumes cutlers health. Bottom line is that cutler an lovie won a lot. I think an Angelo-Emery-Lovie combo would be a winning one. Somebody, maybe Angelo, could have stopped emery from reaching and they could have made a good squad together.