I don't believe so, even though he didn't play in 06, I believe his clock started after the 2005 season. One of the reasons I didn't keep him. I'm not so sure under the new exemption rule. This is the exact wording from the rules thread: I interpret this as meaning that since he missed the entire 2006 season it doesn't count, so his exemption years would be 2005, 2007, and 2008. Juan can confirm or correct my interpretation. I always was under the impression that the clock started following the first year a player loses his exemption. If I misinterpreted, oh well I guess... I'm not positive I interpreted right either; that's why we need clarification from Juan. I was thinking of the option analogy myself. A player has three option years, but they don't have to be consecutive years. I was thinking the same thing held for exemptions, but I don't know that as a fact.