But OBP*SLG*ABs approximates Runs. So it would seem easy to compare two players by adjusting Runs for outs used. Two .800 OPS guys, one .400 OBP and one .300 OBP, the .400 guy would create more runs and would use fewer outs. At that point though you might as well just use one of the more accurate Runs Created formulas. That's what I was getting at. It's slightly better than the widely available OPS, but not as good as the still widely available better RC formulas, EqA, etc. how accurate is it compared to the more complicated formulas?