The baseball-style approach has always been my preference for basketball, as well. The one-year rule is a sham perpetuated by the NBA upon college basketball. It makes a mockery of college athletics. If a player is prepared to jump straight from high school, let him. If a player goes to college, he should go to college as a student-athlete (and I'm not naive about this sort of thing, I'm actually more cynical than most. The NCAA just shouldn't sanction non student-athletes is all.). I completely agree. The one year rule is basically useless. What is the point of making a kid spend one year is college? Is he really going to benefit from taking a few freshmen intro classes? I doubt it. I've been talking about a baseball style rule for a while now. If a kid wants to go out of HS, let him. But if he decides to step foot on a college campus, he's got to stay for a couple years. But one year is a waste. in the NBA, though, I think that would drive more kids to jump from high school. in other words, they're only going to college at all because they have to. give eric gordon or whoever the option not to and they won't. how much would college basketball have suffered from not having Gordon, Mayo, Beasley, etc. this year?