Jump to content
North Side Baseball

abuck1220

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    17,737
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by abuck1220

  1. Hill pitched well in AAA, but he pitched like crap with the big league club last year. I'd rather see Guzman called up. But I'd definitely take either over Rusch. hate to break it to you, but there's a decent chance that guzman will pitch like crap when he first comes up too. marshall didn't pitch that well in his first start. you just can't expect a guy to hop right into the rotation and put up a 2.50 era. I'm not sure what I said that could have possibly caused you to infer that I'm expecting Guzman to put up a 2.50 ERA, but anyways... he's been in the minors since 2000 and I'm ready to see what he can do at the major league level. i am too. but you don't want hill b/c of the lumps he took last year, and i think it'd be naive to think that guzman won't have similar problems at first.
  2. Hill pitched well in AAA, but he pitched like crap with the big league club last year. I'd rather see Guzman called up. But I'd definitely take either over Rusch. hate to break it to you, but there's a decent chance that guzman will pitch like crap when he first comes up too. marshall didn't pitch that well in his first start. you just can't expect a guy to hop right into the rotation and put up a 2.50 era.
  3. he wasn't overmatched in the spring. he had some bad outings, but he was also dominant at times. and i think some struggles are to be expected when you jump from AA to the bigs in like four months.
  4. i'd make it based on his previous 200 starts.
  5. i'd obviously prefer guzman to rusch. you know what you're getting with rusch -- crappiness. guzman could struggle, but at least there's potential. i'd take hill too (6 ip, 3 h, 1 er, 6 k's last night).
  6. pfft...let's see barrett do that when it counts.
  7. OBP down to .259. but i think he's still fast.
  8. at least keith foulke had a nice career.
  9. maybe they're going to have him take rusch's spot and call up hill/guzman.
  10. sure did. both against rusch. It'll come out that Rusch tips his pitches I garantee that! The Reds have the secret suace on him somehow. the secret is that rusch sucks. but it's not really much of a secret.
  11. sure did. both against rusch.
  12. nice comeback by beckett. 1st inning: 30+ pitches, 3 walks, 1 hit, 1 run 2nd-7th: 70 pitches, 1 walk, 2 hits, 0 runs
  13. i don't care if it's persuasive, i said i didn't want to have an argument about this in the minor league game thread. Then why accuse me of manipulating stats, mention only career numbers and not look any deeper into his stats in the first place? Doesn't add up. Anyway, we are each welcome to our opinions and, you are absolutely right, the minor league forum isn't the best place for this discussion. Go Cubs! the reason i don't look deeper into his stats is b/c there's nothing to see. he's bad and his stats are bad, bad, bad with the exception of a good part of '04 and maybe half of 2005. and he absolutely sucked today. sucked. but it's not that surprising b/c he's sucked for the majority of his career. hill or guzman needs to be called up, and they both pitched great this week.
  14. this must be one of those rare times that rusch isn't on.
  15. i don't care if it's persuasive, i said i didn't want to have an argument about this in the minor league game thread.
  16. you know what i see here as much as complaints about dusty, hendry, or neifi? people complaining about people complaining about dusty, hendry, or neifi.
  17. i've made a huge mistake. don't think i should have started loe.
  18. yet somehow his numbers suck. weird. Wow, 6-2 3.47 sucks? Last year, he had a period of about two months where he struggled, but then found it again at the end of the year. And prior to that two month period, he was really good. If you allow yourself to conclude that he fixed whatever was wrong, he can rightfully be expected to be a dependable starter someone who will give you a good to quality start much of time. That's my argument for why over the last two seasons he has been on about 75% of the time and he has the good numbers to prove it. You just have to look at little deeper to find them. in other words, you have to manipulate the numbers. yeah, just take out a two month stretch...no big deal. why don't we take out 1997-2003? his numbers look even better then. his career era of 4.90, his career whip of 1.47, the two month stretch that he sucked last year, his first start against cincy. i guess that's it. i've argued the rusch sucks argument a hundred times before, i don't want to argue it any further and soil the minor league forum.
  19. yet somehow his numbers suck. weird.
  20. hill's done. 6 ip, 3 h, 1 er, 0 bb, 6 k's and glendon rusch is in the rotation why....?
  21. stupid tuesday afternoon game... another good inning for hill...less than 10 pitches plus a k.
  22. it's bad enough when your SP gives up a hr...but, man, it really chaps your ass when he gives it up to your opponent's hitter. patterson's not a good match w/ MMP. since when did they start letting adam everett swing at 3-0 pitches??
  23. well, the cardinals did kinda play like a class A team this weekend, so...
  24. [-(
  25. in other words, juan cheats overnight by changing all the numbers. barrett!
×
×
  • Create New...