i'm not big on murton, and i didn't expect much from him this year, but to call him a D+ player is pretty ridiculous. every gm in the majors would take murton over bynum, without a doubt. I'd take Murton over Bynum, too, but I still think Murton has been overall below avg. this year. And, again, that could be because I did expect more out of him. My question is if we never dealt for Murton would he be playing in Fenway Park by now? That goes to my point about our GM setting him up for failure. i didn't expect much from murton, but you might as well see what he's got by letting him play it out. if you don't let him play, then you go into '07 w/ him still being a question mark.