i think that's how it should be anyway. that way it's more like free agency. it's stupid that the yanks could bid $20,000,000 and could be beaten out by a cub bid of $20,000,000.02. I don't see what's so stupid about that. In a sealed bid, the highest bid wins. If they were willing to bid $20,000,000.03, they should have (although they aren't going to lose by $0.02, there is probably some sort of incremental requirement). There is a problem if certain bidders get to view others' bids. The other option is for an open auction, but that doesn't even happen in regular free agency. then why not do sealed bids for all free agents? i don't see the difference. also, it would really be unfair to the cubs if they bid 30 mil to get the rights and the second highest bid was 10 mil. i'm assuming the cubs would have to pay the full 30 mil...that's not at all like free agency either.