If my aunt had a pair, she of course would be my uncle. I don't understand this line of thought, who's to say that the replacement for Marmol would have converted all those opportunities? Many teams in fact, can point out that a slightly different outcome here or there would give them 3-4 extra wins at this point in the season. not all that unreasonable to expect better than 2/5 saves converted especially when at least one of those blown ones was of the 3 run variety edit - and i guess dolis actually got "credit" for that one, but yea. Every team is going to have their share of blown saves, so it's not realistic to chalk each one up as a game we should have won. However, the Wood-Marmol connection was especially bad early on. i didn't realize that saying "just think".... if we had actually managed to save a reasonable 5/5 games instead of 2/5 - one of which involved a 3 run 9th inning lead - we'd be .500 instead of 11-17 constituted chalking up more wins every team is going to have blown saves... doesn't change the fact that converting all of a small sample like 5, especially given some of the circumstances involving them, isn't an unreasonable expectation. and i'm pretty sure a 40% (or is it 50?) conversion percentage isn't all that realistic to project over the long haul, either. Not disagreeing. Also, it's more frustrating when most of those saves we're blown largely as a result of excessive BBs.