Jump to content
North Side Baseball

jersey cubs fan

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    67,892
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    63

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by jersey cubs fan

  1. The answer in descending order is: Yankees Dodgers Giants Mets Red Sox Atlanta Cubs Phillies Cardinals Padres Angels Dodgers, again Diamondbacks
  2. Hey Justin, you see that glow flashing in the corner of your eye? That’s your career dissipation light. It just went into high gear. It seems dumb to consider, but Fields future may be determined by this game. If he lights up the Packers and knocks them out of the playoffs, you know it will be hard to convince the McCaskey’s to move on. They love the kid. And what they want above all else is stability. I don’t think Poles thinks that way, but you never know. The new market inefficiency may no longer be winning while a QB is on his rookie contract, but may be signing a less than elite QB to less than elite money, leaving room to build around him that other teams cannot afford. Anyway, the Bears are 3 point underdogs but the Packers are nothing special and this game is up for grabs.
  3. Eagles/Hurts are not great.
  4. They absolutely sabotaged year 2.
  5. I don’t really care. Keeping Eberflus and drafting a QB is asking for failure. Replace Getsy or not, it doesn’t matter. Eberflus is the head coach and that’s a problem.
  6. Nah, average QBs don’t do what Fields does at his best. Fields’ consistency issues are different than average QBs.
  7. I f Eberflus is returning, you’re better off keeping the whole band together than trying to string it together piecemeal
  8. Win probability at 72%, so they still have a chance of not blowing it. Gotta keep it below 90
  9. I didn’t realize how poorly Detroit executed that. Such blatant attempting to confuse. You can’t have three guys go up to the ref like that. I don’t care if the coach explained it beforehand. I’d much rather see Dallas lose, but that was poorly done by Detroit
  10. If there wasn’t much to lose, I guess I get the idea of continually going for 2. But it seemed like a lot of banging head against a wall for no good reason. I can’t tell if Detroit was jobbed or not, but when you attempt to intentionally obfuscate the opponent with reporting different people as eligible you are kind of inviting the refs to ruin it for you.
  11. It would be incredibly ballsy. But, they will be hiring a DC and there will be turnover elsewhere on the staff. As others have pointed out, the list of quality OC candidates willing to align with potentially the final year of Eberflus may not be long. The Bears thing to do is bring back Flus, draft a QB, go 6-11 in 2024, fire Flus and bring in a new staff with no ties to the draft pick. McCaskey and Warren have to be devising a plan to avoid that scenario.
  12. This isn’t a cheapness issue. They’ve paid multiple head coaches simultaneously before and will do it again. The issue is they are desperate for stability. They don’t want to go through head coach turnover every 2/3 years. They want the Lovie stability to return. Eberflus is their idea of a modern Lovie. Despite a couple quit jobs in 2022, the players by and large play hard for him and his side of the ball got better. That’s their justification. It won’t work, but the thought process of pretty obvious. The question is how deep a hole the next guy will be in when he replaces Eberflus in 2026.
  13. Why do they keep going for 2?
  14. I’ve seen 12 men called via review and think it’s fine.
  15. Bears will draft either this mizzu qb or one of the osu QBs.
  16. I imagine they’ll wait as long as necessary to A) make the decision, and B) give the illusion that they are considering keeping fields for bargaining purposes. Darnold was traded in early April. They traded their pick in early March last year. It seems sometime in that timeframe makes sense for either scenario.
  17. They need to sign their Hossa either this year or next
  18. The team he plays for acquired him as an afterthought in a trade of their own top drafted qb that didn’t amount to any team success. Goff was a bust in LA. They were desperate to give him away and move on. The theory people are peddling is the best way to build a team is taking a QB as high as possible. The Detroit Lions are not a supporting example of that theory.
  19. Goff don’t count. He was a bust until he resurrected his career. He’s not an argument for taking a qb at the top If anything he’s an argument in favor of building a solid team and plugging in a qb to round it out
  20. Yeah. the defense becoming surprisingly decent doesn’t mean much to me especially since it’s an antiquated system regularly exploited by competent QBs. If this was a defense that routinely shut down top offenses, than by all means you consider keeping him on. But he’s horrible in game and his defense isn’t that good. make the clean break and hire the best offensive coach for your draft pick. Don’t keep him around only to replace him next year when the QB gets a whole new staff. Be done with this nonsense of holding on to portions of a coaching staff with lane duck qbs.
  21. I wouldn’t say I’ve been okay with them but definitely more or less accepting fate when it comes to their shortcomings.
×
×
  • Create New...