You think it's more of a 5-10 year big picture type move? No, genius, I think it's a [expletive] move. No reason to get racist. I don't think it would be particularly exciting, but if he's a secondary pitching addition, then it would absolutely be the type of move made by a team looking to capitalize on the next two years. You don't sign such a player for any other reason than to hope for near term success. I don't understand why you sign him at all. Personal bias could be clouding my judgement, but I want absolutely nothing to do with Lackey. pitching depth. It's a stated need by management and a real concern. A guy who can pitch adequately has value. I'm not a fan of the guy and I wouldn't campaign for his signing. But as long as he isn't the headliner, it's fine.