The problem is he's not apologizing at all for his actions, but for his lack of better judgement (and for that, and that alone, is he truly sorry) I realize that I've brought this upon myself, but the separation you're making between his 'judgment' and his 'actions' is perplexing. They're inextricable. But I'll leave it with again reiterating that any apology is not going to come across as 100% sincere, one because it probably isn't, and two because even if it was it can't be in this medium. No statement, statement, statement with different words, it's going to be criticized as insincere no matter what. Given that curve, it avoided some of the worst problems that come with these apologies, so it's pretty good for what it is. Chapman was and remains not a good person, and people remain justified in not liking his acquisition. I'm not sure how you find that perplexing. They are not at all inextricable. His apologizing for his judgement is PR 101 for deflecting blame from your actions. He didn't apologize for what he did, and he is very clearly on record stating he did nothing wrong in the first place. It's the "put myself in better situations" defense for a DUI.