Jump to content
North Side Baseball

jersey cubs fan

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    67,893
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    63

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by jersey cubs fan

  1. lol are you kidding me? What? Haven't you watch D. Lee since the all-star break? A pathetic excuse for a supposed leader with his hitting. I don't think Keener was disagreeing that DLee has been struggling, but that he doesn't deserve to have garbage thrown at him. DLee has a higher OPS in the 2nd half, than he did in the 1st half but he's not batting 1.000 with runners on so he sucks :roll: Whats funny is when you throw the stats out there, and prove just how wrong he is, he suddenly becomes quiet, and doesnt even acknowledge it lol. He has been scuffling though. He's got a 730 OPS over the past 7, 790 over the past 14 and 830 over the past 28, all of which are below what he did in the first half. The whole garbage thing is a bunch of nonsense though.
  2. The empire carpet guy? Everybody loves the 588-2300 guy.
  3. Only if "True Fans" = Stupid, gullible, hope-filled, Morons. Sure. I hate "true fan" talk. But I'm going to watch every game I get the chance to watch, regardless of the direction the next few weeks take. I think he was using "true fan" as the opposite of "bandwagon fan" Regardless it always annoys me. It's definition is vague and is almost exclusively used in a pretencious manner. It's also really popular with Yankees fans and a close cousin to "true Yankees".
  4. Only if "True Fans" = Stupid, gullible, hope-filled, Morons. Sure. I hate "true fan" talk. But I'm going to watch every game I get the chance to watch, regardless of the direction the next few weeks take.
  5. I'm not sure how that would be proof the Cubs will never win. It's not like this is some great Cubs team that STL is magically going to outpace. The Cubs are a little better, but they are mediocre.
  6. This is bat guano crazy. The Cardinals ARE NOT GOOD. In addition to not being good they are trailing 2 other teams in the division. Yeah but they sucked last year too though. And lookitt what happened. But they never trailed one team in August, let alone two. They also had an average offense and above average pitching. This year's team has an average offense and below average pitching. Last year they were the mediocre team to benefit from no competition in the division. This year, it will probably be somebody else.
  7. I see a reason. They're a bad baseball team. In spite of our recent performance, we're still average at worst. I'd say the Cubs are really bad at their worst, and really good at their best. But average overall. :D
  8. A team that hasn't won a World Series in 99 years, and pessimism is labeled "irrational". And a team "in contention" in the worst division in baseball. That's beautiful. that's an over emotional sentiment around here. The fact that we haven't won a WS has very very little to do with the '07 team's struggles -- that's superstition. And you win a WS by making the playoffs. You get to the playoffs by winning a spot. You win a spot by putting yourself "in contention" for the stretch run. That's why we are in a position deserving of some optimism. Yes, the Cubs have put themselves "in contention" by beating up on bad teams during the weakest part of their schedule, which is what they are supposed to do. And what's the explanation for the first two months of the season, when they dug this current hole that they still haven't got out of? And you completely missed my point about pessimism. Pessimism and a Cub fan goes together like peanut butter and jelly. Anyone who thinks that we are going to see a World Series title with this team is more than welcome to, but it isn't very logical. It's not an "emotional sentiment", it's facing facts. I'll agree with this paragraph to the point that this isn't a great team and a WS should not be expected (not that one is impossibly out of reach, though). But this paragraph doesn't even address my previous comment about the "emotional sentiment." This team is not good because it scores too few runs and is dealing with injuries and a lack of power. IMO, the pessimism in this thread (and scattered throughout other threads) is irrational. The fact that you equate pessimism with Cubs fandom is perhaps true, but not a reason for pessimism. If we fail to win a WS this year, it's not because we've failed for 99 years before. That's all I'm saying: there are many reasons to be frustrated about this year's team, but yes, if you bring the whole "woe-is-us, we never win anything" into it you have became irrationally pessimistic. I don't see any justification for that accusation.
  9. this team is exactly what their record shows, a barely .500 team. and that might be enough to get into the playoffs. Probably correct. Time will tell. I think we're capable of better we just don't bring A game every time. That's baseball. Everybody is capable of more than their 162 game record indicates, in short bursts. But your 162 game record is what you are.
  10. SWEET Time to appeal (and drop the appeal after the Cubs play the Brewers). Wait, don't you want him to drop the appeal BEFORE the Brewers come to town? Like maybe, for the entire series? I think he's saying that's how he believes Prince will do it.
  11. Sounce: link Oh wow...he's gonna get a Ron Artest-like suspension for that. If a player wields a bat in attacking a pitcher, a Ron Artest-like suspension won't cut it (If I'm in charge, that is). He'll join Pete Rose and Joe Jackson. I would hope.
  12. There is no such thing as a very good Chicago Cubs lineup. They were average, at best, with a healthy Soriano and Ramirez, and that's exactly what they'll be if they get both back.
  13. What are you looking for that it's not being helpful? These links should tell you what you're looking for. http://www.weather.com/outlook/travel/businesstraveler/local/60613 http://www.weather.com/outlook/travel/businesstraveler/wxdetail/60613?from=36hr_fcst_business http://www.weather.com/outlook/travel/businesstraveler/hourbyhour/60613?from=36hr_topnav_business
  14. What's the point in posting this? Seriously, why even bother if this is all you're going to say? It's Gallagher's dad. Still. What's the point? Loosen up, after the initial Gallagher call up, there has been some good natured back and forth regarding early info. Why are you telling me to loosen up? I just said there's no point, and there isn't. There's no point to 99% of what's posted on the boards. You could read between the lines and theorize that somebody with info believes Gallagher isn't going to be sent down to make room for Piggy, or that at least there is discussion about other possible moves than this most likely one.
  15. My thoughts are the Cubs will win 1 more game than Milwaukee and go into next week 1 game behind in the standings.
  16. Same here. Unless there were a team that was dumb enough that Jack Wilson, Cesar Izturis, and Matt Morris comprised half their payroll. But that could never happen, so I don't feel sorry for anyone. You forgot Kendall.
  17. No. I was also stunned. Put me in as stunned as well. If I had to guess, I would've said 27-29. I was stunned when I looked at his age a couple years ago. He hit well in the minors but didn't get a legit shot until he was 29. That's a waste of a player's prime.
  18. Yeah, it would be worth it to me, but it doesn't mean he'd be worth his contract.
  19. It's not even close. It's the same players that have combined to be barely an average NL lineup.
  20. Not only did they complain about him possibly injuring himself. But they said Lou should have given Patterson or someone else an at-bat. Overall I like the Rockies announcers though! It was a very dangerous move by Lou. It wasn't about having fun. It was about sparing a short bench. They already have just 5 active players, and with Ramirez not playing, there are just 4, with 1 being a catcher. So that leaves 3 guys. I don't know why he couldn't let one of them play.
  21. If every other team in baseball didn't put a claim in, I'd be shocked. I remember thinking a couple years ago he'd be an interesting target, but then I saw how old he was. He had a real late start to his career. It took a while for people to give him a shot. But you're right, even a small market team would have to claim him, because you could be getting a 105 or great OPS+ out of a $4m player next season.
  22. No. He'll grind out an extension in no time.
  23. He can produce in the 5 spot. It's a myth that he has only been able to hit at leadoff. He's a 5 hitter right now, and as he ages, and his legs get worse (two leg injuries already this year) it's only going to get more and more obvious.
  24. the point of the thread is...ahh, nevermind. ](*,) My problem with the thread is... dark times? What's so dark about 'em?
×
×
  • Create New...