Jump to content
North Side Baseball

jersey cubs fan

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    67,899
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    63

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by jersey cubs fan

  1. And Oklahoma was garbage for a while before Stoops got there. Miami and Florida were both pretty nondescript for a while there - hell, Miami still kind of is, though they appear on the way back up. It's not hard to figure out the common denominator. The ability to get any athlete they want.
  2. Because Dunn is only owed $12m this season, whereas bringing back Holliday would require more money per year and many more years.
  3. The BCS bowls seem anti-climactic and dull to me.
  4. You asked what's so different between the two, and I pointed it out. Juan Cruz has nothing to do with the difference between Guillen, a bad hitter most of his career coming off a bad year, and Burrell, a very good hitter most of his career coming off a bad year.
  5. So Meche would be the newer version of Marquis, leaving the Cubs a miraculous lightning in the bottle acquisition of Edmonds and midseason Rich Harden trade away from repeating 2008, I guess?
  6. How is Guillen that much different than Burrell? Pat Burrell has been a damn good hitter for most of his career with a couple bad seasons, Guillen has been a horrible hitter most of his career witha couple good seasons. And what either of them are any more is a platoon power outfielder who are aging quickly. Burrell has a better hitting pedigree, but Guillen is not a comically bad defender. In a perfect world I prefer Burrell, but if it means the difference in adding someone like Cruz as well as Guillen, I take that over Burrell every time. Guillen is a little older and apparently aging faster, and not a good defender either. He's coming off 3 of 4 really weak seasons, whereas Burrell has been a beast in 3 of 4 seasons. Aside from a bad 2009, there really isn't much of a comparison.
  7. How is Guillen that much different than Burrell? Pat Burrell has been a damn good hitter for most of his career with a couple bad seasons, Guillen has been a horrible hitter most of his career witha couple good seasons.
  8. Yeah, I've heard his name as the centerpiece for virtually every potential trade involving an actual superstar this decade. Cano was on that list for a short time, but when he actually built on early success that ended quickly. For all of their veteran star acquisitory ways, I can't think of a Hanley Ramirez type "one that got away" player the Yankees have had to part with. Eric Milton and Nick Johnson are the closest things to a traded away star.
  9. I really don't like Melky. He made a splash in his first full season, but started to decline to the point of really sucking in year 3. He had a bounceback year, but still doesn't impress me even though he's only 25 and should get better. I feel like he's a short chubby barely passable CF who stands no chance of sticking there longterm and would be a worthless corner outfielder. He's hidden nicely on a team loaded with hall of famers, and I feel like the whole Yankee pedigree is always going to make him more expensive than he's worth. I feel like Colvin could come up soon and do what Melky has done in the majors.
  10. There's always the challenge of being able to win at the very highest level. Lots of coaches are egomaniacs that can't resist the temptation. Steve Spurrier and Nick Saban for example. What does Urban Myer have to prove at Florida? That he can win without the son of God.
  11. I had sprint and never had any problem in Wrigley. I "watched" a couple NFL drafts there, and have always used it to check scores and the occasional weather front causing a rain delay.
  12. [expletive] coward if there is such a thing as playing not to lose, Lovie personifies it, and he's not very good at it.
  13. are the bears out of timeouts or this is more cowardly lovie not even thinking about trying to drive for a score before halftime? 2 minutes to go, 2nd down, that is a no brainer time out territory for the defense.
  14. the igloo is a really crappy arena
  15. Not when your best receiver is kept in to block. That's multiple red zone pass plays were Olsen has not bee in the route. Is it hard for anybody to understand how poorly coached this team is? Not enough men on the field for a punt, ridiculously unnecessary failed fake kick, more tackles going offside (and the Bears also got away with an illegal snap, since the entire line moved before Kreutz snapped it earlier). They can win this game due to the Rams incompetence and Cutler's talent, but these coaches are pathetic.
  16. He can say they are better, and I wouldn't argue. The problem is his idiotic defense. He said "all phases" then cited centers, goalies and a push on defense. He didn't mention wings, where the Blackhawks arguably are better, and it just doesn't add up that they are better at goal and a push on defense. What is more accurate is probably that they are better in goal and the Hawks are better on defense.
  17. And I'm going to be there. Hradek said Pittsburgh is better in all phases, citing centers, goalie and a push on defense. No mention of wingers. And I'm not sure how they can be considered better in goal and a push on defense when they've allowed 19 more goals in 3 more games.
  18. I had no idea Philly was strugglng. It seems every year they are poised to be one of the better teams and then disappoint.
  19. kicking a man when he's down? hahaha Much better than hitting him in the face with a golf club when he's down.
  20. It does have a little "methinks he doth protest too much" feel to it. When something like this goes down wives are going to give their husband's crap, and they have little choice but to bad mouth him. I feel like he's being honest and is upset though. He could easily see her as sort of a daughter.
  21. Not gonna lie, I care about none of that right now. Seriously, that is a ridiculous list.
  22. You also traded away a guy in Fox who can be useful doing things this team actually need, scoring runs, as opposed to another mediocre arm doing things this team doesn't have that much trouble with. And Miles wasn't brought here to give 170 PAs, part of the problem of having him on the roster was the complete lack of replacement when Ramirez went down. There's an opportunity cost there that is more than just what Miles did. Gray is a 28 year old who wasn't a particularly good minor leaguer and hasn't been a particularly good major leaguer. He's the quintessential dime a dozen bullpen arm.
  23. I'm sure he doesn't need it in the "feed the family" sense, but he played QB in the 80's and 90's, not in the $10m/year era we're in now. I'm sure he made a good amount, but I'm sure Matt Leinart made as much or more. You figure half that salary went to taxes and agents, a good amount went to living it up as a pro athlete in his 20's, and like most young rich guys he must have had a bad investment or three. I'm sure he's fine, but he's not in generational wealth mode either. Northern California blows Kansas away, but it's also a billion times more expensive to live there. If there's a huge gap, you'd have to consider it. And while Stanford is good right now, it's been good before and disappeared. This may be his best chance to climb the coaching ladder. You'd have to at least consider it.
  24. Hendry is not working on a limited budget. He's working with a huge budget. It's his fault that he tied up so much money as to make it tight already while the team is still in need of upgrades. And it doesn't help that part of that budget is being spent to pay people to play elsewhere, peole he foolishly guaranteed contracts to when it was well known that the team was for sale and future payrolls were in doubt.
×
×
  • Create New...