Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Backtobanks

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    7,315
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Backtobanks

  1. Can't believe we couldn't have matched/topped that offer for Puk. Within a few hours, we could have solved our LHRP problems with either Puk or Chafin.
  2. From MLBTR: The Diamondbacks have agreed to a reunion with Andrew Chafin, as the veteran left-hander will rejoin his original team on a one-year deal with a club option for the 2024 season. Chafin will earn a $5.5MM salary in 2023, and Arizona’s club option is worth $7.25MM (with a $750K buyout). Up to $1MM in bonus money is also available for Chafin if he makes at least 55 appearances in 2023. Sounds like a great deal for the DBacks.
  3. That's pretty much what I've been reading.
  4. For better or for worse, that was a 108 win team that probably underperformed. Everyone in charge seems content to shoot for low 90s. More like low 80s.
  5. No surprise there because he's basically free.
  6. Are you willing to give up Morel or PCA?
  7. Maybe the Giants won't like his medical records and we can come in and swoop him up for less money.
  8. MLBTV has him at -2 trade value. It's almost like MLBTV's numbers are just made up. :-k They seem to value years of control over ability sometimes.
  9. According to MLBTV, Escobar also has negative value (though Bote's is worse). That's why prospects might need to be added. How in the world does Escobar have negative value?? He makes only $10 mil this year and is expiring. He can play multiple positions and is average to plusish at them. He’s put up 2.3, 2.6, -.5 (COVID year), 2.9 and 3.5 WAR last 5 years. He’s projected for 1-2 WAR this year with average defense but power and can fit in to the lineup in multiple roles. He’s not going to take a lot to get, probably one of the pitchers who can be a SP/RP/Swing type this year and maybe a little extra lotto ticket type. But don’t see Bote having any value to them. MLBTV has him at -2 trade value.
  10. The Cubs cut Bote and literally nobody took him for league min. He has negative value. According to MLBTV, Escobar also has negative value (though Bote's is worse). That's why prospects might need to be added.
  11. So I take it you don't think Morel can get better then. Morel can get better because he's young, which is why his trade value is high and he might be of interest to the Blue Jays. Meanwhile we get a solid catcher that's controlled for 3 more years.
  12. I like Morel, but I think the Cubs ought to trade him while his value is high. MLBTV has Morel at 28.2, while Jansen is at 24.8. If they won't do an even swap, tweak the deal with prospects on both ends. Then see if the Mets will swap Escobar for Bote with necessary tweaking.
  13. There is some speculation about the Cubs and Mancini, but I haven't heard anything at all about Will Myers. I assume Mancini might take less money/years, but Myers might be a viable option if the money/years are reasonable.
  14. Why wouldn't he recruit for a team and a city that idolized him for 9 years. I'm sure after he got over the hurt feelings of being traded (like all of the others), he realized that baseball is a business, and he came out of it in a great spot.
  15. Send them Bote instead of a 45-grade prospect to help with the money. McCann is owed $24 million/2 years, Carrasco is owed $14 million /1 year and Bote is owed $9 million /2 years. McCann + Carrasco + $15 million for Bote (add a 45-grade prospect if necessary).
  16. Cubs' motto for this winter should be: Would’ve been a nice add/deal for us.
  17. I really don't think there's much of a plan. If there ever was a plan, it seems that it is basically gone now and they're waiting it out to see what they can get for a discounted rate.
  18. Get back in the tank. There’s no point trying to win 82 games in 2023. Don't worry, they won't.
  19. I’m old enough to remember when the Only Hope was Carlos Correa Not that I’m super optimistic but the meat of the ideal offseason, as I saw/sees it, is available…Swanson, Rodon, Varsho, Luzardo, Ohtani, even Matt Moore Edit: Phone is trying to get me to buy a new one…weird I meant Jed's only hope to possibly save his job, not the only hope to build a championship team (because that ain't happening)
  20. That's Jed's only hope left - swing a blockbuster trade or two. Ohtani, Jansen, Lopez, Reynolds, Deevers, Varsho, etc. might be available for the right package of prospects.
  21. but there are lots of guys who would still have fit into an efficiency plan with more bulk. jed can't be scared of 2 year deals. I mean the obvious answer to your question is that the offseason is not done yet, particularly in the "guys who will settle for 1-2 year deal" range. Like I'm nervous about who the other SP is going to be, since that's a position that's been picked over pretty good, but otherwise IMO it's just wait and see what happens with the shortstops before getting too depressed or elated. IMO it's telling that Jed was expedient in addressing CF, the thinnest position in FA. Then Jed needs to swing a blockbuster trade or two using some of those prospects that we seem reluctant to deal.
  22. The Cubs have had a good enough off season to solidify their hold on 3rd place in the NL Central.
  23. But we'll give Swanson 8 years? I don't want to even hypothetically defend the Cubs but... You're implying they're similar in age, position, and injury history, which is incorrect on all 3. I totally understand those points, but my point is that they seem willing to go to 8 years for a SS that that is a slight improvement over the current SS.
  24. But we'll give Swanson 8 years?
  25. $200,000,000 / 8 yrs. for Swanson?????????????????????????????????????????????????
×
×
  • Create New...