Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Backtobanks

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    7,331
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Backtobanks

  1. You really are brainwashed by Hoyer/Ricketts.
  2. Then add two more prospects and change from Miller to Gilbert/Kirby if that will make you happier.
  3. Miller had a 3.4 WAR last year and made $749,000 last year and he's not a FA until 2030. Woo had a 2.4 WAR at the same salary and same FA date. Kirby had a 1,9 WAR, same salary, FA date of 2029. Gilbert had 2.8 WAR, salary of $4 million, and FA date of 2029. All 4 of them are dirt cheap with at least 4 years of control. All of them will certainly get raises in their arbitration years, but not as much as some of what the mediocre FAs are asking.
  4. How about Hoerner + Alcantara +Wesneski + Thaiss for Miller + Garver.
  5. Since the Mariners are really interested in Hoerner, I wonder if they would do Hoerner + Alcantara + Palencia for their closer Munoz. Baseballtradevalue.com shows us overpaying, but it might be worth it to get a young, cheap, and proven closer.
  6. OMG, you mean using prospects! That's almost as bad as spending money.
  7. You do realize that Castillo has between $75 million and $100 million left on his contract over the next 3-4 years,
  8. I'll accept the fact that Stroman has regressed, and he may not be what the Cubs want or need, but saying the younger Stroman "was at least a #4" is ridiculous. His 11-year career ERA+ matches Kyle Hendricks.
  9. We can hope that they luck out and get Sasaki, but Stroman is as good as the 4th level FA starters they're looking at and saves money instead of costing money. Also, they would get 2 prospects if the rumor is true. Again, trading Bellinger is not my first choice, but it does fill a hole and might encourage Hoyer to use the money and use some prospects to fill some other holes.
  10. I posted yesterday about the rumor of Stroman, Vrieling, and Selvidge for Bellinger which might be a decent deal (if true). We fill the bottom of the rotation, get two pitching prospects, and save about $9 million this year. Trading Bellinger has to get us a player to help the MLB roster next year.
  11. If a team like the Yankees doesn't worry about breaking even on the dollars for a player that might win them a WS, then he is useful and valuable.
  12. I agree that we don't need to trade Bellinger and/or Hoerner, but that seems to be all of the Cubs' talk this offseason. There are lots of ways to improve the club, but not when the front office isn't willing to spend money or trade prospects.
  13. https://fansided.com/this-yankees-cubs-trade-would-give-new-york-an-all-star-juan-soto-backup-plan https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/other/cubs-trade-proposal-ships-2-time-all-star-to-yankees-to-replace-anthony-rizzo/ar-AA1uA8dE?ocid=BingNewsSerp
  14. I saw a rumor of Bellinger to the Yankees for Stroman + Selvidge + Vrieling. We save about $9 million and get 2 pitching prospects.
  15. Interesting trade proposal from BTV: Luzardo + Faucher for Alcantara + Arias + Mcgeary
  16. It looks like Ballesteros is more DH than catcher. According to Baseballtradevalues.com Ballesteros has a value of 21.9 while Raleigh is 19.8, O'Hoppe is 24.9, and Langeliers is at 20. He probably wouldn't get any of those guys alone in a trade, but adding another prospect might get it done.
  17. Rather than the Mariners and their infield situation, I'd rather get Crochet from the WS who need to upgrade everything.
  18. After getting a top SP, I would like them to sign Bieber for 2026 (or maybe late 2025).
  19. It will be fun to watch, since we won't be participating.
  20. Sorry baseballtradealues.com. I guess the trade proposal was a bad contract deal for all the players involved.
  21. He's owed $138 million over the next 5 years (ages 31-35), so maybe a team that seems obsessed with staying under the LT ought to take a look at it.
  22. The reason you would use Swanson is because of his contract. As Stratos posted, he is easily replaced with Nico for a lot less money and you open a spot for Shaw or Busch if Bellinger stays. The offense would look pretty good with Bellinger, Busch/Shaw, Hoerner, Paredes, Happ, PCA, Suzuki, Murphy, and Soler.
  23. Saw this trade proposal on MLBTR: Dansby Swanson for Sean Murphy and Jorge Soler.
  24. Outside of pitching, it's hard to discuss the roster until we find out what Bellinger is doing.
  25. It's hard to have a well-rested bullpen when modern day baseball shoots for 5 innings from the starter.
×
×
  • Create New...