One thing to remember, when BJ Upton came along in the draft he was said to have yearly GG potential. Look how that turned out. I'm sure if you read the reports on all of the top one-hundred or so prospects for the draft you would say "I wouldn't mind having him." Developing = Raw. I don't know what he means by saying "best all-around" SS since Upton. For one, if a player isn't the best, he can still be the best all-around? He's just more balanced but inferior so it's a worthless label. Oh well that's another argument. There was a better HS SS in 2005, Justin Upton. Outside of the Upton brothers there has been a bit of a down time with SSs from HS. We're looking at Matt Bush, CJ Henry, Chris Nelson, Trevor Plouffe, and Brandon Wood. Wood wasn't a great prospect at the time but has developed plus power, Jackson's power is probably going to develop solid power, but he won't consistently hit 30 HRs. Not even close. Outside of him, the others? They've all sucked major league ass. Trevor Plouffe is probably another good comparison. Plouffe has got an outstanding glove but hasn't hit much. He may be better than these guys are as good them. Chris Nelson and him are similar, but in general it doesn't appear to be a good idea to draft HS SSs because they play SS. The ones who can hit rarely stay at short. Brandon Wood for one...