Jon
-
Posts
19,262 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Joomla Posts 1
Chicago Cubs Videos
Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking
News
2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
Guides & Resources
2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
The Chicago Cubs Players Project
2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker
Blogs
Events
Forums
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by Jon
-
-
Hard to read some of the article.
-
-
http://www.chicagotribune.com/media/photo/2010-09/56399469.jpg
-
Wow, Mark Dantonio is back. He'll be coaching from the box this Saturday.
-
Michigan will win by at least 10. This. As long as Denard Robinson doesn't get hurt, Michigan isn't going to lose to any teams like Indiana. They're mirrors of each other on defense, both have equally capable offenses and it's in Indiana. In fact, Indiana has the edge in the kicking game and a better kick return season so far, though punting is a wash.
-
Really need to work on the checkdowns for next week. And design more pass plays for Forte. Cutler did not have a good game.
-
Hahahahaha. I love that the Packers just gave up.
-
Squib time!
-
I can't decide if a TD or FG would have been the better outcome. I'm leaning towards TD, but not by much.
-
run, run, run
-
Do not get that...
-
Now that was impressive, Olsen.
-
Another great post-"fumble" effort by the Bears for recovering that one just in case.
-
Yeah, imagine if they called it the other way and Lovie's stupid challenge would've been an issue. People would've been ready to run him out of town. How was that a stupid challenge? It clearly wasn't obvious if the contact was a touch on the sleeve and it was the difference between a TD and a situation where they've really, really struggled.
-
That was an AMAZING play by Jennings. He knew exactly where he was and no part of his body every touched the line. Fantastic.
-
It's going to be really close to see if this ball stays in bounds AND Jennings recovered it in bounds.
-
Right in the upper chest. Not even a glancing hit to the helmet.
-
Or a different kind of dump-off.
-
I'd like to see Forte more active here.
-
I think they said 2nd. hmm, so we didnt lose two on the timeout/bad challenge? It was a timeout for the purpose of challenging the play. You can't lose two timeouts. Can and have The last time we played the Packers, actually Not when you call a timeout for the purpose of challenging the play. If you call a timeout and then decide to challenge it later you can, but Lovie notified the official immediately.
-
It was obvious he was going to run that one, but nobody stepped up.
-
I think they said 2nd. hmm, so we didnt lose two on the timeout/bad challenge? It was a timeout for the purpose of challenging the play. You can't lose two timeouts.
-
They blew that call. There wasn't any contact to the head.
-
Someone tell Melton he's playing on the defense, not the offense. You don't jump into a pile at the end of the play from behind and give the other team 2-3 extra yards.