There isn't a surefire way to solve the college football championship issue. My point is I don't really care if you're 5th and feel screwed. If it went to an 8 team playoff, #9 would feel screwed, and I'd care even less. They choose to be in the conference they are in, and they schedule their own out of conference games. If you are willing to remain in a weak conference, then it's your own responsibility to get tough OOC games to make up for that weakness. It's not like this system was just sprung on them. This has been the case for years. And prior to the BCS, they wouldn't have even played in such a big bowl game as they did. I think an 8 team playoff would have less chance to leave someone out that should be there though. Mid-major undefeateds are usually in the top 8 at least. Meanwhile Boise State went undefeated, won a BCS bowl game, and are still ranked 5th and would have missed any "playoff" scenario. Any team left out of an 8 team playoff almost assuredly has a loss. It's not like Boise State can just go hop on over to a major conference or something. They're in the WAC because they've had to build their way to national significance. And they had to start winning some big games so they could start scheduling better opponents. Not everyone can be in a major conference. But that doesn't mean they shouldn't have an opportunity at the Championship. Bottom line: Theres less of a commotion when a number 9 gets left out of the playoffs. They, obviously, have less of a chance of going all the way. I think people have given Boise State a little bit of recognition. The thing is, you HAVE TO SCHEDULE PEOPLE OUT OF CONFERENCE to get respect. Thats how it works, and thats how it SHOULD be. Boise State played NO ONE RANKED before they got to the Fiesta Bowl. Obviously its hard to say they are a top 8 team or something.