As someone from Peoria, we've seen both Cardinal and Cub low-A teams over the last couple of years. I'm not sure if Nathan feels comfortable commenting on the differences he's seen day-to-day, but from the fan perspective, here are a couple of things I noticed: 1) the Cardinals didn't really seem to pay a lot of attention to the players they had in Peoria. I don't remember there being a lot of organizational roving instructors or management that came around all that often. With the Cubs, there were several folks down last year, and several of them multiple times. Maybe they came when the Cards were here and I just never heard about it (or I have a lousy memory) 2) the Cards didn't do a whole lot to make their players all that comfortable. Our Chiefs last year (as Cubs) got a meal after every home game, I think, where as our guys a couple of years ago as Cards had to spend a lot more on food when a homestand was on. Certainly St. Louis has done a decent job bringing (some) talent up through the ranks (Pujols and Molina, for example), but I'm not sure how different their strategy is from the Cubs - getting veteran talent, because they can afford it, and using young talent to trade/compensate for it. Just my 2 cents :) Karen