imb
-
Posts
31,202 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
112
Content Type
Profiles
Joomla Posts 1
Chicago Cubs Videos
Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking
News
2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
Guides & Resources
2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
The Chicago Cubs Players Project
2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker
2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker
Blogs
Events
Forums
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by imb
-
im going to go 0-2 in the last two weeks, by a combined less than 10 points. you took all the luck, you bastard.
-
Very interesting article. Amazing just how valuable Edmonds is, in that case. The Fish have to trade Lowell, and move Miggy to third base.
-
Who cares who wins, as long as it's over soon.
-
Dreams of Brian Giles in Cubbie Blue...
imb replied to cubsva's topic in MLB Draft, International Signings, Amateur Baseball
If Tampa Bay traded Johnny Gomes, you might as well just contract them now. -
You have a feeling....yet no facts on which to base that feeling. I have a feeling that Pierre is in regression and what we saw of him in 2005 will be what to expect in 2006 if not worse. I can't back it up, but I think you should trust my feeling. Well you do have Yoda as your avator, so you may know something I don't. In conclusion, the "cw" hasn't been debunked since there's not 100 years of stats on the topic. Anyone else getting sick of the overuse of this abbreviation in this thread? Not as sick as I am of seeing people completely forget to turn their brains on when reading a thread. Clever insult. Sorry that some of us do not possess an Ivy League diploma like you. It doesnt take an Ivy League education to know that you shouldnt present something as fact without actual facts, and that the correct pattern for entering a thread is to read>comprehend>post.
-
You have a feeling....yet no facts on which to base that feeling. I have a feeling that Pierre is in regression and what we saw of him in 2005 will be what to expect in 2006 if not worse. I can't back it up, but I think you should trust my feeling. Well you do have Yoda as your avator, so you may know something I don't. In conclusion, the "cw" hasn't been debunked since there's not 100 years of stats on the topic. Anyone else getting sick of the overuse of this abbreviation in this thread? Not as sick as I am of seeing people completely forget to turn their brains on when reading a thread.
-
hahah you lost I can't wait until the White Sox win the World Series.
-
Another putdown by you. Nice. Perhaps the dense one is the one who can't grasp the concept that Pierre may help other players not named Castillo. So if you believe that, prove it. Lookup Furcal and Giles from 2002 to 2005. I must have forgotten that Furcal and Giles played on the Marlins with Pierre. If you believe that Pierre distracts the pitcher and helps the hitter, prove it, otherwise you're just spouting off uninformed nonsense. When I get the Marlins job I'll bat Cabrera 2nd and prove my point. so, in other words, you have nothing to back up what you were saying. It's ok, I dont think anyone thought you did. So you want me to look up several years of Marlins boxscores and find where someone else batted 2nd instead of Castillo. I'll stand by 100 years of baseball conventional wisdom. Castillo's just an aberration. I just want you to actually show something to back up what youre saying. I mean, anyone can say something like "When Pierre is on base, the batter gains the ability to FLY", but if they have no proof to back up that statement, then it's a worthless statement.
-
You're the one saying that Pierre distracts pitchers. Where's the proof? And again you've completely missed the point about injuries. Hairston when healthy is Pierre's equal, yet no one is looking at his production and sees "leadoff man extraordinaire, if only he could stay healthy". Who cares about "when healthy." He rarely is, which is the bigger point. No, because the point isn't that Hairston would be a better option. The point is that nobody has suggested that Hairston, when healthy, would be a good leadoff option. So why is Pierre, a similar hitter, considered a good one? Let me ask you this directly. If Jerry Hairston could stay healthy and put up numbers in line with what he has done for the past four years, would you consider him the answer to our leadoff problems? If Mookie Wilson was still 28, I'd want him. Sorry, I'm not playing fantasy baseball w/ you guys, and if someone is going to give me a .350 obp leading off they better be pretty fast. Hairston isn't that player. He might get hurt on his way to second. It's a simple yes or no question. Do you consider yourselve "above" answering it? HE'S NOT PLAYING FANTASY BASEBALL, he's just living in one.
-
Another putdown by you. Nice. Perhaps the dense one is the one who can't grasp the concept that Pierre may help other players not named Castillo. So if you believe that, prove it. Lookup Furcal and Giles from 2002 to 2005. I must have forgotten that Furcal and Giles played on the Marlins with Pierre. If you believe that Pierre distracts the pitcher and helps the hitter, prove it, otherwise you're just spouting off uninformed nonsense. When I get the Marlins job I'll bat Cabrera 2nd and prove my point. so, in other words, you have nothing to back up what you were saying. It's ok, I dont think anyone thought you did.
-
Another putdown by you. Nice. Perhaps the dense one is the one who can't grasp the concept that Pierre may help other players not named Castillo. So if you believe that, prove it. Lookup Furcal and Giles from 2002 to 2005. I must have forgotten that Furcal and Giles played on the Marlins with Pierre. If you believe that Pierre distracts the pitcher and helps the hitter, prove it, otherwise you're just spouting off uninformed nonsense.
-
Another putdown by you. Nice. Perhaps the dense one is the one who can't grasp the concept that Pierre may help other players not named Castillo. So if you believe that, prove it.
-
are you dense on purpose? He isnt saying that we need to make Hairston the leadoff hitter, he's saying that their rate stats are similar, and no one is calling Hairston a worldbeater when he's healthy. And you're the one that said that Pierre distracts the pitcher.
-
How does a .334 lifetime OBP solve the leadoff problem? Its not like Hairston had a breakout year last year or showed an ability to do better, his numbers were almost equivilent to his career numbers. WHY the lifetime stats??? :x :x :x :x Hairston's numbers last year were right on par with his lifetime stats. It is more likely than not that next years will fall right in line. I just don't see how a .334 OBP solves the leadoff problem. Neither does a .326, both players suck.
-
hahah you lost
-
im cheering for it to be over asap, so the offseason can start.
-
I think that if we actually start signing the right players, we might.
-
Yeah, .276/.326/.354, what a leadoff man.
-
Not to sound like a troll but, the Cubs should only do that deal if they believe they are one player away from seriously contending for the world series. That's stupid. We have the money to spend, we need to improve our outfield, and Giles does that. We cant dick around and make little piddling improvements until we get close enough to a WS that one player will put us over the hump. We need big changes, now.
-
Why not Bobby Abreu?
imb replied to TrueBlueCubFan's topic in MLB Draft, International Signings, Amateur Baseball
What makes you think Morneau can play the OF? You say it with such certainty, but he's never played the OF in the majors. -
i hate card fans.
-
thanx
-
no
-
Give me Pujols.
-
you should have run full speed at him and then gone into a slide, only to see him dive out of the way.
