Well, the way I see it is you make trades to get better....depending on your situation. The Twins, it seems, will be losing one of the best pitchers in baseball. If they hang on to him and can't get an extension, they lose a lot. If they deal him and get a bunch of quality players that they have financial control over for low salaries - they win. That's why they are going to pick the best deal out there. That proposal that doesn't include Rich Hill does not compete with what other teams are offering for him. At the same time, I think Hill and a couple other quality young ballplayers are as good or better than what the Yanks and Red Sox are offering - with the added bonus of the Twins not having to face him except possibly in Interleague play. If the Cubs traded Hill, Prior, and if need be Pie or Patterson - and get Santana WITH an extension for even $18 mil a year - they are a much better team. Both teams win. I agree that a rotation minus Hill, but adding Santana is better then last year. My argument is that a rotation with Santana, Z, Lilly, Hill, __________ is GREAT! IMO, you could work out a deal in which both teams get what they want. I don't think you have to include Hill or Pie. You may have to include one, but not both. I'd rather give up all/or most of Cedeno, Patterson, Gallagher, Marshall, Colvin, Murton, etc. You get my point. BTW, Murton would be someone that I think the Twins would value and could be part of a deal as well.