No, beyond the fact that the incredibly obvious point that it makes needs to be made, it's really not. It's so bad. "Here's a bunch of different names with wildly different sample sizes, approaches, flaws and minor league careers, very few of which are similar to Baez! CALM DOWN!" Saying that Baez isn't a bust yet is just common sense; that piece just went about "proving it" in a really hamfisted, poorly done way.