DeJesus is 1.5 WAR player. Whether or not we contend next year is almost certainly not going to be affected by this. The best available FA are OF, if we don't sign at least one of them it doesn't matter, if we do the DeJesus' trade becomes completely irrelevant. that makes no sense. even with a 100-110 million payroll, the cubs have tons of money to spend. this is still baseball and there are 2 wild cards, you can still go from trash to good in one offseason while other teams go to [expletive]. by your logic, what's the point of any team ever signing a 1.5 WAR free agent? or what's the point in the cubs signing anybody this offseason? 1-2 wins could be huge. it could decide a postseason spot. mostly, he makes the team better and i think we should try to make the team good His production is easily replaced. A Lake/Sweeney platoon would likely be cheaper and potentially more productive. If they plan on signing an OF this offseason, then DeJesus would be an extraneous piece. Final judgement on this should be withheld until we see what happens this offseason, but DeJesus isn't a guy who you look at and say "where are we going to recoup the production from?" either way. No, but he was a guy you could count on pretty reliably, and the Cubs can actually use guys like that. Again, he's not making or breaking the team, but he was a reliable player who didn't cost a lot, wasn't blocking anyone and now you're potentially left hoping that Lake can be as serviceable if they aren't out there looking to spend. Again, it's less DeJesus himself and more what this trade possibly represents.