Andy
-
Posts
37,269 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Joomla Posts 1
Chicago Cubs Videos
Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking
News
2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
Guides & Resources
2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
The Chicago Cubs Players Project
2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker
2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses
Blogs
Events
Forums
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by Andy
-
The Colts also cut Addai, Dallas Clark, Gary Brackett, Melvin Bullitt and (finally) Curtis Painter.
-
I actually kinda like Xavier's resume more than St. Louis'. I don't get how St. Louis is being considered a lock or for a 9 seed. I like St. Louis's resume quite a bit, and did before I knew where they were seeded by the wiseguys (my main resource for this stuff is Glockner's Bubble Watch on SI.com, which doesn't give seeds but is a good place to find any bubble team's RPI/SOS/good wins/bad losses all in one link). I can't really explain why I like it, but they only have 2 losses to teams outside of our NCAA discussion, which is fewer than just about any of the other teams they're being compared with.
-
I don't think either's getting in as an at-large. On the bright side, among nearly identical resumes for UMass/St Bonnie/St Louis/Xavier/Dayton/La Salle, one of those teams is getting the auto bid, and doesn't need an at-large selection. St. Louis is pretty much a unanimous 'in' right now (Bracket Project puts them as a 9 seed). The others are pretty much up for grabs though. I think Xavier or Dayton could maybe play their way into an at-large with some help.
-
I don't think either's getting in as an at-large.
-
I could see one of Marquette/Georgetown dropping to a 4, but I feel like Wisconsin has to beat MSU to really make that likely.
-
I'd trade Tennessee with Washington. I definitely think Seton Hall and Northwestern should be out. South Florida might not be safe anymore, either.
-
I'd drop Washington from the locks (I for one, didn't account for their loss in my rankings yesterday) and into consideration.
-
That was a basketball atrocity. Louisville might beat ND by 25 tomorrow.
-
I didn't really want any Pac-12 at-larges in there anyway. Washington has to be out now.
-
If USM loses to ECU I'm going to have to drop them a few spots.
-
Silly thing to argue about, but I doubt the committee would set up an intrastate UNC/Asheville matchup in the round of 64.
-
Seriously, horrendous. Couldn't have asked for a better draw in the conference tournament. Get the job done tomorrow fellas.
-
Also, minor quibble, Ohio State is listed in the top 16 and in the 'other' at-large locks.
-
You're kidding me right? UNC had better be really, really, REALLY good at whatever field you're studying.
-
I ended up with 32 at-large locks and absolutely nobody else I felt deserved to get in at all. Conference tournament week may reveal more than usual this year.
-
They did have some absurd number at one point, but now they have 6.
-
Sent in my list earlier today. Looking forward to this!
-
I agree, time for a Notre Dame update! Andy??? :hello: ND beat Providence tonight and will be the 3 seed in the Big East tournament against seed 6/11/14 on Thursday night. :hello:
-
Not buying Kidd-Gilchrist's claim that he wants to stay til he graduates, I take it?
-
They were, but they seem to have gotten better when it matters most. Good for them. Stan Heath is an outside contender for conference coach of the year.
-
As of the end of October 2010 I'd have laughed in the face of anyone suggesting he'd ever be worth anything. Really impressive turnaround by that guy.
-
These are not getting funnier. In case you were wondering
-
No fighting over my team once again, I see. Although I should probably be fired as hypothetical GM after picking Gabbert over Newton in last year's draft.
-
Really hoped to go through the season without really taking an ass-kicking. Georgetown usually doesn't agree with my sentiment. They are a nightmare matchup.
-
I'm going to try to do this again too. It's fun consistently outperforming the experts.
