Looking at the programs you mentioned, the common theme seems to be poor coaching decisions in the face of a variety of circumstances. Tennessee and Texas had long established coaches who were more or less forced out due to fan/booster pressure, with inadequate replacements coming in. Penn State had the opposite issue, with Paterno overstaying his usefulness (scandal aside). USC had some mediocre years, but even when they were going 7-5, they were beating good teams and not losing by 5 scores like Michigan is. I'm not sure what the heck AD's at these schools are doing, but there is really no excuse for a blue blood program to settle for anything less than the elite coaching options available to them. Rolling the dice on an up and comer or settling for a guy with school-ties is a little dumbfounding. That said, the fans are as fickle as ever. They're already turning on Urban Meyer here in Columbus. Elite coaching options aren't as cut and dried of a category as you make it appear. Clearly not, but in many cases, everyone can see a disaster coming. Whiffing on Les Miles and settling for Hoke was such a case It's not as easy as it may seem to find an elite coach, but it's probably not as hard as Goony implies either. The key is substantive, long-term head coaching success. Hoke didn't have that. He only had one great season at Ball State (against a wildly easy schedule), then had two good-but-not-great seasons at SDSU. There aren't guys like this available every year, but the ones who have proven they can do it, often repeatedly, like Urban at BG and Utah and Brian Kelly at CMU and Cincy, generally are the safest bets to have success at the blue-blood level. James Franklin, Charlie Strong and Chris Petersen were all hires from last off-season that fit that mold.