This is an absurd argument. Sammy had arguably one of the greatest seasons in MLB history in 1998. He absolutely carried the Cubs...thats not just an assumption, the numbers bear it out. The case you are making is ridiculous. Sammy's 1998: 308/377/647, 66 hr, 158 rbi, 73 bb, 158 k Sammy's 2001: 328/437/737, 64 hr, 160 rbi, 116 bb, 153 k As outstanding as Sammy's 1998 season was, his 2001 season is among the greatest in history, at least for someone that we don't know was juicing during the season (which would DQ all those absurd numbers Barry put up from 2001-04). In addition, the team Sammy very nearly took to the playoffs by himself in 2001 was even worse than the team he took to the playoffs in 1998, as I've posted before. Sammy's 2001 is almost inarguably one of the greatest offensive seasons anyone's ever had, all things considered.