Hey, I want to see Lou's "FIRE". But for reasons of him yelling at the UMPS when a bad call is made. IE: Him defending his players. So please understand there is not just one side of this. Remember when Mabry was called out at first and he was CLEARLY safe? He threw his helmet down and looked in disbeleive. It's moments like that a manager NEEDS to go out there. i just don't see the need to make a complete ass of yourself in a public venue in front of mthousands and millions. i understand your point, but i also think a lot of people are expecting piniella to be the anti-dusty and see tantrums as a welcome change. Any time a coach gets fired, fans (and the organization doing the hiring) look for the new coach to be able to do what the old coach couldn't or wouldn't. That's why you see Charlie Manuels after Larry Bowas, Ozzie Guillens after Jerry Manuels, and Lou after Dusty. I don't really care if Lou ever throws a base, but I do expect him to do what Dusty couldn't: handle the clubhouse and hold players accountable for their mistakes. I'm sick of seeing major league players make little league mistakes. If Lou has to throw a base or kick dirt to get his point across, so be it. this is only necessary if he sees the right mistake. missing a cutoff man = minor mistake forgetting to ever be selective at the plate = major, recurring and thematic mistake dusty's problem wasn't that the players had no respect for him, his problem was that he told them to swing at everything for the sake of "just putting the ball in play". fans of every unsuccessful team almost uniformly bemoan the team's inability to execute the "fundamentals" of the game. fans of successful teams still hate that sometimes the baserunners overrun the bag or miss a cutoff man, but their teams are successful so the "fundamental" miscues get forgotten quickly. fans of unsuccessful teams sit and stew after a loss. "why couldn't he hit the cutoff man on that one play?" instead of "why did that guy come to bat 4 times and see only 5 pitches?" the idea of a guy missing a cutoff man once becomes a shining symbol, a scapegoat for the whole season. you can see why ramirez's lack of hustle was blamed for the downfall of 2006 cubs when nothing could be farther from the truth. if anything, ramirez's play was one of the few bright spots during an otherwise dreary season full of 1-pitch plate appearances, cowardly slap-hitting, sub-par pitching, and under 400 walks. an easily identifiable, though inherently meaningless, problem is a "lack of fundamentals". it sounds good to say, makes a fan feel like a ballplayer when all it is is a small pimple on the side of the face of a season; a season raging with several STDs, emphysema, ulcerative colitis, hysterical pregnancy, AND juvenile diabetes. These "meaningless" fundamentals were a systematic, recurring problems as well. Unless you're the Yankees, you can't win consistently and shoot yourself in the foot like the Cubs did the past two years. Missing cutoff men, terrible baserunning, horrible pitch selection, missing signs, inability to lay down a bunt, etc. were all things that have plagued the Cubs, and these are all directly on the shoulders of the manager. Successful teams either do these well, or don't do them at all because the manager plays to the team's strength. Dusty tried to play small ball, but he couldn't stop his players from screwing it up. He tried to preach defense, and yet he somehow managed to screw that up too. OBP, in my opinion, is a failure of the whole organization, from Baker to Clines to the players Hendry picks. There was only so much Baker could do, although he certainly made it worse. OBP is important (and the downfall of our offense) but it's not the ultimate determinant of every game. There's a lot more to a manager's job than just making sure someone takes pitches, and that includes preparing his players and correcting mistakes that are made.