I'm criticizing their performance on the margin of things not because I think they're killing the viability of the Chicago Bears to be an ongoing concern. So yes, they're meeting and exceeding that very low hurdle. That isn't any reason for them not to attempt to do better. I also think you'd have to take some outrageously stupid risks, or literally set piles of money on fire, to jeopardize the Chicago Bears as a viable NFL franchise. So what some would call conservative leadership I think I would call unnecessarily losing out on the risk-reward payoff. And as I said, I think that is indicative of a losing culture or at least not a win-maximizing one. The operations/player personnel decisions aren't totally divorced from the business side. The latter informs and shapes the former.