Wrong. The new CBA DOES make it an either/or proposition, unless you're much luckier than the next guy. The route they're taking is hoping they stock it up SO MUCH, that the pipeline stays solid for their entire tenure. Which I'm figuring is that 10 year threshold Theo's mentioned before. If it takes until 2015, in order to be competitive(which unfortunately may wind up being the case), they'll have had 4 high draft slots and 3 large IFA budgets, plus trades where we acquired prospects. At that point, if this system isn't the best in baseball, something's gone wrong. But having that type of system then allows a better team to take more risks as well and if you hit on a couple of them, it stays at the top. It's basically looking to me like these guys are going to have one cycle. 3 years of being bad, with the last being slightly better, followed by 7 years of being good to excellent. The FA that are signed to big money likely will be coming off the books around that 10 year period and it's probably around the time the system will be on it's way down as well. So, if they want to jet at that point, they'll be leaving the team with more than they came into it with.