not that i disagree that hendry could be a candidate for exec of the year, but i'm not sure what theriot and dempster have to do with it. there was basically zero doubt that they were going to make the 25-mean out of spring training, it was just a matter of how they would be used, which seems like more of a credit to lou than anything. fukudome, harden, edmonds i can agree with, and gaudin could probably be added to that list. re-signing wood for relatively cheap to be a reliever could also be a notch on his belt for exec of the year consideration. The overriding concensus on here (which I thought to be warranted but vastly overstated) were that Dempster and Theriot were simply unacceptable players that needed to be replaced with players who represented an improvement. And the whole offseason Hendry kept reiterating that the club was high on both players and ultimately stuck with both, to great results. The Edmonds signing is another great example of Hendry going against strong dissent from the fanbase to improve the team. And call me naive, but I think there really was something to MacPhail handcuffing Hendry in previous offseasons. As he has shown with Fukudome, Lilly, Soriano, Harden, etc. if he wants a player he'll do whatever it takes to bring them aboard. I strongly suspect he would have signed Beltran and probably Furcal without MacPhail pressuring him to stick to a budget. And he's forced to go halfway, and employ inferior options in Cedeno, Burnitz, Jones, which doesn't suit a big market team very well. Trading prospects for legit proven players is how a big market team ought to operate, and he seems to understand that.