Jump to content
North Side Baseball

sneakypower

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    13,403
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by sneakypower

  1. i shudder to think of what your team full of fliers would end up looking like
  2. Mark Donnal surely isn't a better recruit than Zak Irvin at this moment in time, but Scout is also under the impression we have two different Nick Stauskases in the '12 class, so what's the use in quibbling
  3. pretty disappointing that Torreyes came into the season with a career .375 babip, and is sitting at .188 right now for the season he's been spectacularly helpless against RHP so far, too
  4. what, you don't think a playoff team should have a bullpen consisting of james russell and 5-6 bad pitchers? ...the Rays and Cards had bottom-5 bullpens last year and if you can accurately predict what players are going to be good relievers in future seasons, you are likely using some type of sorcery that is terribly wasted on baseball talk
  5. you just know he's been saving that one up for the last 4 years now tell us about more #1 prospects who ought to be good eventually
  6. i'm not worried about it too much, he's always been really streaky he'll have a two week stretch lifting his numbers to where you'd expect them to be
  7. Melvin was a legendarily bad fielder (at SS) coming up through the minors, in terms of errors, but he's always had incredible physical skills to allow him to make plays like this: his CF defense is legit; he's one of the fastest runners in the game and his arm is fairly elite
  8. oh man, Hawk's heartbreak made my day Sox started the 9th four runs down and after a Valverde blowup (and likely serious arm injury) put the go-ahead run up to bat in the form of Viciedo, who came about two or three feet from an opposite field HR ""Stretch! Stretch! Stretch! DAD GUMMIT NO.............Mercy!"....long pause, "All right we tried"
  9. yes to Demp you're probably right about Drew, who might take a one-year deal if he doesn't have a big second half; i'd love to try going long-term though
  10. pass on Hamels and the 8/180 or whatever he ends up getting, and use that instead on: BJ Upton 5/80 Edwin Jackson 3/35 Stephen Drew 4/55 F. Liriano 1/6? RF DeJesus (B. Jackson) CF Upton SS Castro LF LaHair (Campana) 2B Drew (Barney) 1B Rizzo 3B Stewart (Cardenas) C Castillo (Clevenger) Garza, Samardjiza, E. Jackson, Dempster, T. Wood/Maholm/Volstad/F.Liriano Marmol, Dolis, Russell, Bowden, L. Castillo, Rusin print playoff tickets
  11. having no DH really made both halves of that inning a total bore
  12. well now we know WSR's real name
  13. and if you really want to [expletive] your pants, look at zips' updated projections: http://www.fangraphs.com/projections.aspx?pos=all&stats=bat&type=uzips&team=0&players=0&sort=18,d it's like Where's Waldo, finding Pujols hint: also, who's that guy there above Miggy Cabrera and Prince Fielder a few spots? bizzaro world.
  14. assuming the same playing time they've received so far, through the rest of the season... Pujols: .283/.367/.550 (.917) LaHair: .264/.338/.423 (.761)
  15. Sam Webb basically guaranteed it
  16. http://img2-2.timeinc.net/ew/dynamic/imgs/081124/blank-check_l.jpg
  17. 3 most encouraging developments: Shark's emergence, Castro's defense, LaHair's Hulk-smashing 3 most discouraging developments: Marmol's slider, Baez's walk allergy, McNutt
  18. that's what jersey tells me man you're a douchebag no, you literally did tell me that
  19. Cubs are 7th in NL in FIP. that's including relievers; our starters are 5th-best in all of baseball in FIP
  20. Maholm: 4.05 ERA, 1.08 WHIP Russell: 0.73 ERA, 1.38 WHIP
  21. He's signed to a team friendly contract. He's no #1 ace that teams tend to look for at the deadline he's more a #7 starter on a contending team
  22. is this a serious question? of course teams value a player based on what he has done i imagine the Red Sox looking into a magical snowglobe and seeing all that John Lackey was going to do for them and saying "yup, that is worth $82.5 million to us"
×
×
  • Create New...