Jump to content
North Side Baseball

sneakypower

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    13,587
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    22

 Content Type 

Profiles

North Side Baseball Article Archive, Part 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Trade & Free Agent Rumors

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospect Rankings

Chicago Cubs News, Rumors & Analysis

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Chicago Cubs Fan Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by sneakypower

  1. American Olympic Commentators are Dicks: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YFbGndLHwN4
  2. we're likely without Toussaint, so i can see us losing by a couple scores and falling to like, 14 but i can't help but wonder where we'll get slotted if we actually win
  3. it's a nice touch that Vogelbach's dot is twice the size of all the others'
  4. Adam Dunn was a horrendous and completely unacceptable OFer, so God only knows what the [expletive] you're talking about. What I'm talking about is that as horrendous his OF defense was, his bat was valuable enough that they were willing to accept it in order to get it in the lineup, so assuming he continues to develope as the beast that he is early on, and assuming that Rizzo is our long term 1B, is giving Vogelbach some OF reps an option? But why male models? hahahaha
  5. Phillips is taking some really ugly swings all series and still getting a hit every AB
  6. i brought up his (aforementioned) current slump, to make his numbers look as good as possible? yes. You picked an arbitrary point in time to make his BB & K numbers as good as possible. Are you denying that? yes, dexter or whoever asked what his walk rate was like during his current slump, and i focused on that, and why there's some signs for real optimism there but endpoints for "slumps" are always arbitrarily defined
  7. i brought up his (aforementioned) current slump, to make his numbers look as good as possible?
  8. Out of curiosity, and because I have no earthly idea how to calculate it, what would his line be if his BABIP were normalized to something like .310 or so? that'd just be 12 more hits dropping in play, making it roughly .290/.355/.450 i'm not making an argument about his BIP luck during the stretch, but rather pointing out that if his Howson-era BB and K rates are indicative of a change in approach, he can now be much less reliant upon a high BABIP to be a very productive hitter
  9. Castro's last 38 games: 8.2% BB, 13.3% K, .207/.272/.352 (.210 babip) Castro's previous 72 games: 1.9% BB, 17.0% K, .304/.317/.445 (.347 babip) honestly, a .310 babip makes that a great line; i actually feel much better about his offense going forward now than i did when he was flailing at everything but hitting .300
  10. Counter examples don't make it right. Should I list all the players who started off looking promising, had a hiccup and never recovered? There are more of those, btw, they're just less memorable. how many had great seasons every year, with no hiccups?
  11. how many PA does it take to stabilize for a guy who's likely having his swing overhauled on the fly?
  12. why was McKay windmilling him there??
  13. this discussion reminds me of all the idiotic overreactions Yankees fans and sportswriters had to Cano's .715 OPS age-25 season
  14. wow, almost an unbelievable play by Castro
  15. Not part of the master plan. Got to keep sucking to gain draft picks. http://synthesis.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/emperor.jpg
  16. why go further back to when he pitched with a completely different repertoire? it's the only one representative of what he is going forward
  17. Castro and Upton have the same OPS you dullard
  18. I really don't know that. That's my problem. He is tied for 70th in fWAR among starting pitchers. If you want to do a little voodoo to normalize his HR rate, you could probably get him from 1.3 fWAR to 1.9, which would be tied for 49th. And that's in the second-best year of his career. I guess you could define that as "TOR," but that's in the same way that we get excited about the 100th ranked guy being "top-100." And these are supposed to be his prime years. When we are talking about an extension, we are talking about buying his age 30-35 seasons. I'm not really interested in paying top dollar for the post-prime years of a pitcher who was merely above-average in his prime years. we know xFIP is a better predictor of future performance than FIP, and he's been the 14th-best pitcher in that regard for his duration as a Cub i'm ambivalent about keeping him/trading him, but it's very reasonable to term him a TOR pitcher moving forward
  19. yeah, Polanco's a career .300 hitter with 3 gold gloves; there's not many prospects i'd ever project that kind of career for
  20. i see torreyes as a sure a bet to be a productive major league player as anyone in the system. he may not have the high ceiling as some of the others, but as you've said, his hit tool is too good not to make it and stay for a long time. if he makes the bigs: best case - polanco most likely - fernando vina worse case - mark lemke What the hell? You just turned on Torreyes! You just blindsided him. He knew you were all in on him and now you just hit him in the head with a steel chair. Take out Mark Lemke and move Polanco to most likely and Vina to worst case and I'll buy it more. I'm still working on best case. Polanco was a 3.5-4 win player for a decade, if that's Torreyes' likely career path, he's one of the most valuable assets in the game
  21. i see torreyes as a sure a bet to be a productive major league player as anyone in the system. he may not have the high ceiling as some of the others, but as you've said, his hit tool is too good not to make it and stay for a long time. if he makes the bigs: best case - polanco most likely - fernando vina worse case - mark lemke
  22. http://www.reactiongifs.com/wp-content/gallery/yes/Al_Bundy_excited.gif 5 of those K's were in the first week of the season, too and he's still listed as the only 19 year-old in the FSL
  23. I let out an honest "Ohh!" after reading that. it seems like torreyes has been raking forever now and his numbers still aren't very good. what kind of a [expletive] hole did he dig himself? he had a .127 babip month, somehow
  24. http://sainthelena.us/school/classrooms/specialists/library/catalogs/LibraryTitle/St/Images/1314.jpg
  25. a 31-year-old corpse set to put up a 3-win season, and missed 30 games yet posted 6 WAR last year
×
×
  • Create New...