I really don't know that. That's my problem. He is tied for 70th in fWAR among starting pitchers. If you want to do a little voodoo to normalize his HR rate, you could probably get him from 1.3 fWAR to 1.9, which would be tied for 49th. And that's in the second-best year of his career. I guess you could define that as "TOR," but that's in the same way that we get excited about the 100th ranked guy being "top-100." And these are supposed to be his prime years. When we are talking about an extension, we are talking about buying his age 30-35 seasons. I'm not really interested in paying top dollar for the post-prime years of a pitcher who was merely above-average in his prime years. we know xFIP is a better predictor of future performance than FIP, and he's been the 14th-best pitcher in that regard for his duration as a Cub i'm ambivalent about keeping him/trading him, but it's very reasonable to term him a TOR pitcher moving forward