i actually wondered the same thing a while back updated: Torreyes (milb 5.5% K, .139 ISO, .333 babip) Keppinger (milb 5.7% K, .100 ISO, .332 babip) like i said in the previous post though, the big difference here is Ronald is four years ahead of Keppinger's development, so if we feel that he might have further development to do, his potential should be even better than a Keppinger career arc i still think Polanco can be the hope for him, and Pedroia* the dream - his early BB numbers are encouraging on this front *it's important to remember here Pedroia hits 2/3 more doubles at Fenway and his career .287/.358/.420 line is probably more representative of the real Pedroia