What?! He spent less than a season in the minors. All he did was go through the paces. He was MLB ready out of college. I guess those 9 games in the minors "developed" him. Murton spent little over 1 season in our system to get to the major league club. So the Cubs get no credit for targeting players that need less development? no, they get credit. the scouts get a nice pat on the back. good job. but they didn't "develop" that talent. they just took what was already there. Identifying and developing talent are part of the system. In evaluating the system as a whole, like was being done in the original post, why wouldn't you include Murton and Prior? i include murton and prior in the cubs organization, but not in the farm system, as we didn't have much to do with developing Prior or Murton. I use the word "developing" not "identifying." It was no big secret Prior was going to be a stud. Our farm system should be credited with doing the obvious and selecting Prior 2nd overall in the '01 draft? murton seems to be a last minute throw in to the Nomar deal, not someone we scouted. it's almost dumb luck that we got him. JH's magic 8 ball is paying off. :lol: our farm system isn't worthless. we identified and developed Zambrano (who spent around 3 full seasons in our system before coming to Wrigley). nice work. Z is a STUD. however, we don't have a ton of great prospects, which confounds me, considering how much time we spent losing in the last 10 years and a notable lack of decent position players reaching the majors (who actually contribute). as far as willis goes... if we're going to include identifying talent in the discussion, we can also blame the farm system for letting him go for Clement. if they had correctly identified his talent, as evidenced by their hands on experience developing him, we would never have let him go (his age makes no difference). willis is at most a testament to our development skills and a slap in the face to our ability to identify talent.