Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Ding Dong Johnson

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    39,204
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    23

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Ding Dong Johnson

  1. I love the score for no other reason than my new sig...
  2. Why does everyone in their fantasy lineup keep bumping Aramis down to 5? When healthy, he's the best pure hitter we have in the lineup. Lee's a great player, but I think Aramis is more likely to put up those numbers consistently.
  3. Fair enough, I'll stop posting... She's Giorgia Palmas, and I'm in love...
  4. He also stated the Cubs would probably want to give up less for Bradley. Wow, what a slap in the face...
  5. Absolutely nothing to it. Thanks for wasting my time, Murph...
  6. I think Murph should be nominated. I can't believe how insane this guy is...
  7. Hasn't been anything more said yet. I'm still listening and waiting...
  8. OK, we were both right -- a beat reporter and a rumor about Corey...
  9. I thought he just said they were going to have a beat writer for the Dodgers on and Corey Patterson's name was somewhere in the same sentence. I will listen to what transpires and update as I hear it. I don't have the quote, but he said something about going to Dallas in a bit to see if there's any smoke around the Patterson to the Dodgers rumor.
  10. Take it for what it's worth, but Murph just said something about Patterson to the Dodgers. Anyone have more info?
  11. This team will go nowhere with Orton at the helm. Grossman is a HUGE upgrade at this point in their careers, and that isn't saying much.
  12. Anyone aware of any statistics on how many trades are made solely because one or both GM's get completely pie-eyed?
  13. I thought this was a done deal? The Score (I know, I know) just said it wasn't official yet.
  14. Same with Bedard, Backe, Wang, Vazquez.... If that's all it takes for the Phils to bite, we should get him for not much more than Mitre and Welly.
  15. He is by far my favorite ex-Cub that is still playing and in my top 10 all-time. I have a huge man crush on Bill Mueller.
  16. I won't disagree. I prefer Ronny though. I just wish Dusty and Jim could convince me they do too.
  17. The Gold Glove award itself is a terrible way to determine defensive value.
  18. It was in reference to the number of errors he has committed in the last 4 full seasons (22, 20, 25, 24)
  19. Yet another reason Ronny should play. The report on him prior to this past season was that he was a wiz on D. I saw him play a few times in Des Moines, and I would agree with that.
  20. It's really not that complicated. To score as many runs as possible, get as much OBP as possible, and get as much SLG as possible. The more players you have that are able to contribute OBP and SLG, as opposed to just one or the other, the more OBP and SLG you end up with overall. We've had the SLG, we need some OBP. I'm not saying Gathright's the answer, I just don't understand the glorification of some (Greenberg for one) while crucifying Gathright when there isn't a clear difference in production.
  21. sounds good- this is my last post under this thread ditto
  22. Are you applying this same critique when asked about Ronny Cedeno? It doesn't sound a whole lot different that his offensive scouting report.
  23. Actually, when someone makes a bogus claim and uses a Cubs personell (sp?) as his source, it is a big deal. If I claimed to have a conversation with Gerry Hughes and I claim that he told me the Cubs are about to sign Burnett for 5/55 and then it is proved false, I'd expect to be ripped. First of all, it lowers the integrity of this board. Secondly it may cause some casual readers to question the integrity of the person claimed as a source. Third, it's fair game to rip Bruce Levine, Peter Gammons, or any other person who tries to get the "scoop." I think the same should happen here. If I claim to have an "inside" scoop and I'm proven false, I expect the same level of critique. The fact remains, the report left no room for doubt. "100%" was how it was reported. Had he said "likely", "leaning toward", or something that left room for change then I'd probably drop it a lot sooner. Once again, he was given bum information and then apologized for it. In the grand scheme of life, it really is not that big of a deal. He learned his lesson, let's move on. This is a message board, not the United Nations.
  24. Wow, I'll pretend I didn't read that. Bartender, give me what he's drinking.
×
×
  • Create New...