That's a rather silly exaggeration of what I've said. Some peripherals are proven to be predictive, others aren't. Like, for example... Line drive percentage. It's notoriously fickle and not particularly predictive except over insanely long samples (multiple years). An extreme good LD% and a high BABIP are measuring the *same luck*. If you see his AAA performance as an indication he's ready to be the starting 2b, fine. I think that's defensible. I think you're greatly misconstruing what most are saying here. No one (as far as I can see) is taking great stock in his ML numbers this year, but taking those into consideration along with the swing and approach changes that resulted in improved K and BB numbers at AAA over a larger sample size gives everyone a lot more hope than anybody could have hoped for after the disaster his call up last season was.