Berkman/Dunn for Helton/Bannister is bush league as hell but so is Weeks/Wilson for Utley, and I actually like Weeks. After the first two weeks of the season, as well as Utley has played, the other guy in the trade would have a better record than he has right now by three or four points. He wanted Weeks because he has a very good offense in every category but steals, and he wasn't able to draft any closers, so he's lost saves in both weeks so far. Also, remember that total bases are a pitching category in that league, so relievers are more valuable than they are in standard leagues. Anyway, it's a bad idea to block trades for any reason other than collusion. If you attempt to police trades based on lopsidedness, how do you measure such a thing? Yahoo rankings? PECOTA projections? The commissioner's own idea of who's valuable and who's not?