It's all dependent on the pitcher. Most of these guys are scouted by many organizations. When it's the super majority of scouts' opinions that someone is ML ready out of college, I'd go with that. Promoting someone on stats alone is absurd. Oakland doesn't do that, no matter what Moneyball implies to some people. IP is a great indicator of how resilient and healthy a pitcher is (assuming we're not comparing apples to oranges, RPs to SPs). I'm pretty sure Atlanta uses that very basic stat with a high degree of confidence and frequency, especially in regards to Smoltz and Glavine's latest contracts. Scouts take all sorts of stuff, stats, stuff, makeup, potential, etc to determine whether someone is ML ready (or just evaluating a player in general). Subjective? Yes. But you can cut down on that by using multiple independent scouts. When they overwelmingly come back with the same opinion on readiness, go with it. My distrust for Marshall's promotion has to do with our scouts and organization's success history in promoting pitchers. Prior was the only guy we promoted as quickly as Marshall (IP above A ball) that stuck. Everyone else had to do their time in the minors, working out issues as they progressed through the system. I hope that our org. is finally right about this. History isn't with them, but for Marshall's sake (and ours), I hope he dominates. Prove me wrong. I'd love it. I see your points, but keep in mind that Marshall will only be in the Cubs rotation for the short term; he will not have a roster spot for more than 4-8 weeks. I realize that even if he gets lit up, he may learn something up here that will make him a better pitcher in the future.