Not if you know what you are doing. That said Ryan Harvey and Earl Cunningham say that we don't. Oh and no one thinks Vitters is in the same class as any of those guys were. Why on earth would you bring Cunningham into the argument? It's a credibility destroyer. Not really. People thought Earl Cunningham was an amazing talent. They thought Ryan Harvey was the next Dale Murphy. Everyone things that the top-5 pick they're getting is a can't-miss prospect, but in reality, he's probably not. His point was whether the Cubs know what they're doing or not. Only Cunningham was drafted and "developed" by an entirely different set of people, so his example has absolutely no relevance to that point. No, it isn't that different. Cunningham was supposed to be a once in a generation type talent. He wasn't. When your organization has sucked for decades at developing hitters, you are better off picking guys who have more experience and have already began developing like Weiters. But, it looks like we are going to pick the high school kid once again. But for arguments sake I will go with Montanez, Patterson, Harvey, and Dopirak. You know the high school guys this regime drafted and "developed." Oh and also my point still stands Josh Vitters is not even in smelling range of Maybin, Upton, or Bruce. He is a mistake waiting to happen with Weiters waiting there for the taking.