This is exactly my point. Being "good", at least to me, is relative. Are we good in the sense that UNC, Kansas, or Memphis is? Hell no. But considering that we have three starting freshman and a head coach in just his second year, I think we are "good" relative to our conference. Being good relative to the rest of the SEC is starting to look like being good relative to the rest of the Big 10. So we aren't very good in the same way that Illinois isn't very good?