In actual practice, of course they are, but in the context of the Hall of Fame, nobody has ever been elected because of their rate stats. For batters, voters have always looked at hits, home runs, rbi, runs, stolen bases and those type things. I'm not endorsing that method totally, but that's just the way it always has been. Given the entire history of the Hall of Fame and their criteria, Dawson is clearly AT LEAST a borderline candidate.