I have a hard time subjectively saying that the Cubs are equal to the Brewers in talent going into the future. Most of what I am reading in this discussion is the Cubs fans pinning there hopes on pitching and defense. Most of the defensive advantage seems to be at 3rd base and 1st base. Not exactly the key defensive positions on the field. I think that Braun though can improve his defense(like ARam). The Cubs are better in CF defensively but is it really that much? Offensively the only position that the Cubs are better is LF. If the Brewers were to pick up a RHed hitting LFer better than Mench, the Brewers would probably get equal production there also. So offensively you would have to say the Brewers are quite a bit better. So pitching. I am not certain going into the future how to lineup the starters as who should be 1-5 for each team so I will just list potential obvious starters for next year. Brewers. Sheets, Guardo, Suppan, Bush, Parra, Villenuava and Capuano Cubs. Z, Lily, Hill, Marquis, Marshall and Gallagher This can change of course. Looking at the Top 6 going into next year I have a hard time saying the Cubs are significantly better here. Not nearly as easy as it is to say that the Brewers offense is better than the Cubs. Personally I would rather be in the Brewers shoes. Not only do they seem more talented. They also obviously have a better player development system. Any good team that wants to sustain success has to be good at developing players. I think by 2009 the Brewers are going to be significantly better than the Cubs, unless the Cubs significantly increase their payroll.