Besides the awful analogy, what you are basically saying is that everything that went wrong for the Cubs was beyond Hendry's control. Injured players were beyond Hendry's control, even if they had a history of injury prior to being acquired. No other teams ever had to account for injury problems. Players with poor strike zone judgment was a coaching issue, not an organizational philosophy issue. Even if those players never had good strike zone judgment, it was up to the coaching to make sure they developed it, and it had nothing to do with Hendry's philosophy on acquiring and developing hitters. Same with pitchers with poor command. Totally out of Hendry's control, and purely a coaching issue. Not Hendry's fault that the players in the Cubs system were incapable of throwing strikes consistently, and not Hendry's fault that the players he acquired had the same problem. Again, nobody is saying Hendry is solely responsible for everything bad happening with the Cubs system. The ones that have a problem with Hendry are criticizing that his organizational philosophy is incorrect, and it hasn't helped the Cubs do what they should be doing as an organization with the funding and farm system they had.