Isn't every prospect that isn't a 4-5 tool player a "prove it at each level" or "generic" type of player? Obviously, those 4-5 tool hitters are going to be given the benefit of the doubt most times. They are going to get promoted or fast tracked to the majors. They aren't typically early round draft picks who the team is counting on in the future. And just because a prospect fails to make it, doesn't mean he was "generic". Eric Patterson was a top 2-3 round talent that fell to the 8th and put up a .940 OPS in his first season of pro baseball. LeMahieu and Flaherty were 6'3"+ middle IF prospects who projected to add weight and potentially put up elite power numbers from the 2B position. Ronny Cedeno was pretty highly regarded and has stuck around the majors for a while because of his defense and offensive potential from the middle IF. I wouldn't call any of those 4 "generic". As for the current guys, Watkins is probably "generic" in the grand scheme of things. He wasn't highly drafted or regarded, but he's shown that he can get on base and has increased his power output at each level. I would say the same for Bruno, though he hasn't shown it at each level, he was one of the best players in his league this year. Torreyes and Amaya are far from generic though. Torreyes was the youngest player in his league the last couple years, he tore the cover off the ball at 18 in the MWL last year. He was unlucky this year, but his ability to put the ball in play is far from ordinary. Amaya was also just 19 this year, walked in almost 10% of his PAs, hit 8 HRs at 175lbs, after hitting 0 in the DSL and AZL.