Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Irrelevant Dude

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    12,831
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    14

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Irrelevant Dude

  1. I think you are referring to Onto Waveland (you were close!). "Ok" is about the most glowing recommendation I can give it. I honestly haven't found any Cubs podcasts worth listening to on a regular basis. The official Cubs Weekly podcast isn't exactly hard-hitting, but some of the episodes are good listens.
  2. I thought there was a rather innocuous hold during the first contact, but the second instance just looked like a hand on the back. By the letter of the rules, it was probably a hold, but if you aren't going to call it on every play, don't call it on the most important play of the game.
  3. Given the situation, it was awful. If you make that call in the 2nd quarter of a Bears/Lions regular season game, it wouldn't be a huge deal, but deciding an extremely well played Super Bowl on a ticky-tack touch foul is inexcusable. Nah. If you're going to call it in the second quarter you call it in the 4th quarter too. I hate the "let them play at the end" BS. A penalty is a penalty regardless of when it happens. But if that's a penalty, then so is almost every other play. So they actually did the exact opposite of "let them play at the end."
  4. Given the situation, it was awful. If you make that call in the 2nd quarter of a Bears/Lions regular season game, it wouldn't be a huge deal, but deciding an extremely well played Super Bowl on a ticky-tack touch foul is inexcusable.
  5. That was an all-time great Super Bowl, played cleanly on both sides, marred by an awful call at the end that robbed Jalen Hurts of a chance for a spectacular game-winning drive.
  6. That's a bad call.
  7. Big ad spend this year by... Jesus.
  8. Boy was I wrong in betting the under.
  9. I agree Yeah, the virtually unstoppable 1 yard sneak is kind of annoying.
  10. After watching Bears games all year, it is incredible to see how much time other QB's get, and simultaneously how open their receivers get.
  11. How recent we talking? It wasn’t memorable for me. But there have been worse. I'm inclined to say ever, but that's almost certainly recency bias since I can't remember many of the prior performances.
  12. Most boring halftime show in recent memory?
  13. Just as "better" and "more talented" are two different things. LeBron is undoubtedly more talented and has physical gifts well beyond Jordan or anyone else in NBA history for that matter, but more talent doesn't directly translate to being the better player.
  14. It's more than just a peak though, unless you consider Jordan's entire Bulls career his peak. For the span of an entire "normal" career, you could say that Jordan was better than LeBron. What complicates the discussion is that LeBron has all these extra years, before and especially after, where he is/was really good beyond the point that anyone else really has been.
  15. I have never been a LeBron James fan and there is no way he could ever overtake Jordan in my mind, but damn is his longevity impressive. He is still performing at an All-Star level in the 20th season of his NBA career. He is 38 years old, equivalent to Jordan in his final Wizards season, and looks like he can still play for several more years. I suspect some people's GOAT opinions will begin to change by the time he retires, simply due to the length of his career and the sheer accumulation of stats that will likely never be touched. It is definitely going to be hard to argue with his overall statistics.
  16. Was that supposed to be a compliment?
  17. Seems crazy to not even have Davis in the top 7 Cubs prospects Yeah I think it's an overcorrection, especially when he still has Royce Lewis on his list. Like the injuries crested risk certainly, but he's also a guy you could probably have open the year in MLB if you needed to. Is the risk with Davis really any higher than the hitters in A Ball? I'd say no. I have to believe his (lack of) ranking can be attributed mostly to "we have no idea how to rate him until he proves he is healthy." He is a huge question mark right now, but I would imagine he will quickly jump back up on the lists if/when he does show that he is healthy and his injuries don't appear to be a long-term concern.
  18. I would be alright with never hearing Tony Romo call a game again. He is insufferable.
  19. Wait, did I just read that the Bulls aren't interested in trading LaVine or DeRozan, but they are entertaining offers for Ayo? What exactly are we doing here?
  20. I certainly hope that isn't the case. At some point, this front office has to be able to get extensions worked out for players not named David Bote.
  21. I have a hard time calling the Hosmer signing terrible, because he costs nothing. I don't like that he is blocking Mervis, but I can't get too upset about it. With such a minor financial commitment, either Hosmer is ok/good and ends up being a good value, maybe even a trade chip, or he's bad and gets released if Mervis continues to destroy AAA pitching. For all we know, Hosmer could look awful in Spring Training and not even make it to Opening Day. With a minimum deal, he isn't guaranteed anything.
  22. Couldn’t he DH too? Who is the current DH, Madrigal? The current norm is a 13 man pitching staff, which means a 4 man bench including backup C. If your 1B and DH are basically locked to the bottom of the defensive spectrum, you probably aren't too likely to put another guy like that on the bench. Mancini has played corner OF, but the metrics are not kind to his performance(one silver lining, it's basically limited range instead of a bunch of errors). I still don't see a fit for Madrigal on this roster. He is too limited on defense to be a bench player, and there is no other place for him in the starting lineup except DH. Someone has to DH, but I would prefer it not to be 2-strike punchy ground ball hitter guy.
  23. It basically guarantees Mervis will start the season in AAA. If Hosmer is terrible, which is fairly likely, hopefully the Cubs won't hesitate to send him packing. I guess this could buy Mervis an extra year of team control, but I don't think that should be a priority for a guy who is already going to be 25 in April.
×
×
  • Create New...