Personally, I wouldn't take into account any consideration of steroids versus clean. I'd vote for the best ballplayers. If the league doesn't want to encourage stuff like steroid use, it's up to them to ban these guys from HoF consideration. But when the writers have to choose who they think might have taken roids and who probably didn't... Well, let's just say we wouldn't be allowed to induct anybody for quite some time if anybody our overzealous writers were suspicious of were considered ineligible. Canseco, Giambi, Palmiero, and Bonds... four guys with HoF credentials and concrete evidence they used steroids. Everybody else has to be judged solely on the merits of their baseball career.