Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Rob

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    15,338
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

 Content Type 

Profiles

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Trade & Free Agent Rumors

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospect Rankings

Chicago Cubs News, Rumors & Analysis

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Chicago Cubs Fan Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Rob

  1. This team is not going to win the WS barring some sort of miracle. Guys like Jennings, Westbrook, and Marquis are not going to change the odds enough to justify their costs. If you can't acquire a real impact pitcher like Peavy, it makes no sense to block the kids. I'd rather see what we can get from guys like Guzman and Marmol so we know what our needs will be in 08.
  2. Young guys apparently can't play baseball.
  3. Good or bad, Hendry takes his job seriously. :shock: :shock: I think you should Rethink your sig for now. This signing isn't quite enough to make him worse than Isiah, but he's inching closer and closer. I think he means Hendry is not bad enough to be compared with Isiah. You have to show him some respect for his work ethic. If working hard just allows him to screw things up faster, I'd rather not pretend to appreciate it.
  4. Good or bad, Hendry takes his job seriously. :shock: :shock: I think you should Rethink your sig for now. This signing isn't quite enough to make him worse than Isiah, but he's inching closer and closer.
  5. Why would we bring in a guy like Jones who has to hit .280 to be even remotely useful? It's a bad signing if it's not a NRI.
  6. I honestly think I might be happier about this than the Aramis signing, and that scares me.
  7. Pleeeeease let Rosenthal be hacking away.
  8. Quit ordering them and switch to a real drink. Touchee Speaking of which, I am out of liquor. The winter meetings are always hard on me.
  9. Watching sombody write Meche into the #2 spot in the rotation made me vomit in my mouth a little bit. Meche is a decent #5 or a bad #4. He's not a #2 and never will be. Why do you say that? Nothing in his record indicates a certain predisposition to being the recipient of miracles?
  10. That is one of the single dumbest trades I've seen in a while. It's up there with Kearns/Lopez
  11. Interesting... Yesterday on ESPNews, Tim Kurkjian didn't think there was any possibility that Bonds would play somewhere other than SF. I don't think there is either. But the cosmos has been messing with my brain lately.
  12. Watching sombody write Meche into the #2 spot in the rotation made me vomit in my mouth a little bit. Meche is a decent #5 or a bad #4. He's not a #2 and never will be.
  13. Seems the Yankees are just trying to get Petitte to hurry up.
  14. But is he healthy? Yeah, a down year like that is enough to at least throw the maybe in there. It can't just be ignored. His peripherals are largely intact. I'm not worried about his performance.
  15. Rumors earlier this offseason had the Mets turning down a Milledge for John Patterson deal. Pie, Marshall, and Marmol for Patterson and Church?
  16. That's the problem, everybody just assumes that we could get as much from "the kids" as we would from someone like Lilly. Hill panned out, but who else was there? Well, let's go through last year's options: Marshall: Oft-injured, 5.59 ERA in 2006 Guzman: Oft-injured, 7.39 ERA (with Cubs) in 2006 Mateo: 5.32 ERA Marmol: Had to go on DL, 6.08 ERA If you think you can rely on those guys to do as well or even nearly as well as Lilly/Meche, you're really grasping at straws. Prior and Miller are also in the mix, but Prior will get hurt, and Miller has questions about his durability and stuff. If you go into next year with Zambrano, Hill, and three of the options listed above, you're accepting that the Cubs will be a lousy team again. That's fine, but don't delude yourself into thinking that this team would be in the playoff hunt. ... and you think Lilly and Meche are going to lead us to the promise land? ROFL I think out of those 4 guys you mentioned and Prior/Miller you get at least the production that Lilly/Meche +whoever would give you and probably better production. fine, but stats don't support this at all The stats also don't show Lilly or Meche being of much value to the team... let alone ten mil each. I'd rather roll the dice on the kids next season, seeing as how we're not a WS-caliber team even with Lilly and Meche. At least then we'd have a real idea of whether or not any of these prospects are going to pan out. If not, then we can grab some of the better starters on the FA market next year. It's not as if guys as talented as Lilly and Meche don't come along every year.
  17. Or sign Bonds and Church and have a loaded offense. Still need pitching. And if they sign Meche and Lilly, they'll still need pitching. If those are the only legitimate choices (at the prices being mentioned), I go with the kids and stack the offense. What did "going with the Kids" get us last year? About as far as going with guys like Meche will get us in 07. I agree with the Meche part, but I like taking the chance with Lilly. Then you can always try to pry away another starter via trades. Lilly and Jennings even wouldn't be enough to make this a WS caliber team. That's an average rotation and an average offense. That makes us a possible contender for a wildcard, if things break right. I think we're in the same position the Mets were in after their spending spree pre 05. We're still a year off. The guys on the market just aren't going to be enough to change that.
  18. With Schmidt off the board, I'd rather not sign Lilly or Meche. I didn't see us making a run next year without a legit top-of-the-rotation guy. Since we didn't get Matsuzaka, Schmidt's gone, and we aren't looking at Zito... we wont have one. Lilly and Meche wouldn't be enough to help put us in contention, so neither one on their own would be either. Throw the rookies out there next season and see who sticks. Make a run in 08.
  19. So much for having a good rotation. No combination of available starters would pull that off at this point.
  20. I don't know why we'd want to. Z Schmidt Hill Prior/Miller Lilly That'd be a pretty full rotation.
×
×
  • Create New...